ObjectiveThis pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and informativeness of a mixed-method approach to investigate how the Self changes during psychotherapy within a Dynamic Systems Theory (DST) framework, addressing theoretical heterogeneity and the limits of conventional pre-post designs.MethodFive participants undergoing psychotherapy were scheduled to complete weekly smartphone-based diary assessments over several months (>= 30 scheduled prompts). Each assessment included 11 (nomothetic) ad hoc items and 2 person-specific (idiographic) items. Responses to the Narrative Assessment Interview (NAI) were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis to derive person-specific items and interpret quantitative trajectories (but were not analyzed as a separate qualitative outcome). Quantitative data were analyzed using time-series methods (i.e., trend analysis and ARIMA modeling).ResultsThe Self exhibited various change patterns (e.g., linear, nonlinear, stationary, and non-stationary), characterized by the influence of past values (i.e., the autoregressive component) and innovations (the moving-average component). Moreover, participants exhibited different change dynamics. Therefore, the conditions required for ergodic generalization were often not met in these data.ConclusionThe mixed-methods approach was informative, capturing the complexity of Self-change. The method was feasible in a real clinical setting, but compliance and the time required to perform the analyses were critical.
Antichi, L., Giannini, M., Lauro-Grotto, R., Investigating the evolution of the self in psychotherapy with a mixed-method approach: A pilot study, <<PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH>>, 2026; (N/A): 1-17. [doi:10.1080/10503307.2026.2642111] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/333577]
Investigating the evolution of the self in psychotherapy with a mixed-method approach: A pilot study
Antichi, Lorenzo
Primo
;
2026
Abstract
ObjectiveThis pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and informativeness of a mixed-method approach to investigate how the Self changes during psychotherapy within a Dynamic Systems Theory (DST) framework, addressing theoretical heterogeneity and the limits of conventional pre-post designs.MethodFive participants undergoing psychotherapy were scheduled to complete weekly smartphone-based diary assessments over several months (>= 30 scheduled prompts). Each assessment included 11 (nomothetic) ad hoc items and 2 person-specific (idiographic) items. Responses to the Narrative Assessment Interview (NAI) were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis to derive person-specific items and interpret quantitative trajectories (but were not analyzed as a separate qualitative outcome). Quantitative data were analyzed using time-series methods (i.e., trend analysis and ARIMA modeling).ResultsThe Self exhibited various change patterns (e.g., linear, nonlinear, stationary, and non-stationary), characterized by the influence of past values (i.e., the autoregressive component) and innovations (the moving-average component). Moreover, participants exhibited different change dynamics. Therefore, the conditions required for ergodic generalization were often not met in these data.ConclusionThe mixed-methods approach was informative, capturing the complexity of Self-change. The method was feasible in a real clinical setting, but compliance and the time required to perform the analyses were critical.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



