In plants, proline acts as a compatible osmolyte with multiple stress-related functions, contributing to cell turgor regulation and the dissipation of excess energy. In this study, the use of a proline-rich yeast derivative (SYD) on pot-grown grapevines cv. Chardonnay was tested as a priming strategy to enhance vine water status and water deficit tolerance. Well-watered control vines were compared to those subjected to reduced irrigation at 80% of daily evapotranspiration for 43 days, with and without foliar SYD applications. Additionally, a group of vines received only 40% of daily evapotranspiration (ET) along with foliar SYD applications. The soil moisture content clearly mirrored the three irrigation levels (full water, 80% ET, and 40% ET). However, considering vines kept at 80%ET, SYD-treated vines had a consistently higher midday leaf water potential than controls (+0.22 MPa on Day of Year-DOY-214). SYD-treated vines kept at 80% ET and control vines at 100% ET exhibited similar stomatal conductance and assimilation rates (0.24 vs. 0.25 mol m-2 s-1, and 14.9 vs. 15.3 mu mol m-2 s-1 on average from all measurements), while control vines kept at 80% ET lagged behind SYD-treated vines at 80% ET. On July 20th (DOY 201), in SYD-treated vines kept at 80% ET, leaves accumulated nearly twice the proline concentration compared to control vines receiving the same irrigation (17.7 vs. 10.6 mu mol/g). Treated vines kept at 40% ET had stomatal conductance and leaf assimilation rates comparable to control vines at 80% ET (0.17 vs. 0.20 mol m-2 s-1 and 11.7 vs. 11.5 mu mol m-2 s-1 on average). At harvest, the average yield of SYD-treated vines kept at 80% ET was similar to fully watered control vines maintained at 100% ET (1.75 vs. 1.82 kg), but showed higher soluble solids concentrations (20.9 degrees Brix, vs. 19 degrees Brix in fully watered control vines) and lower average titratable acidity (6.62 g/L vs. 7.7 g/L in fully watered control vines), while no differences were observed in the average titratable acidity between control vines kept at 80% ET and SYD-treated vines kept at 40% ET (6.15 g/L). Proline-rich SYD increased endogenous leaf proline levels and vine water status, also interacting with H2O2 accumulation, and resulted in long-term better physiological functioning at comparable water availability. The applications improved grapevine productive performance, effectively mitigating the negative impacts of reduced irrigation.

Tiwari, H., Bonicelli, P. G., Ripa, C., Poni, S., Battista, F., Frioni, T., Proline-Rich Specific Yeast Derivatives Enhance Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Water Status and Enable Reduced Irrigation Volumes, <<AGRONOMY>>, 2024; 15 (12): 1-19. [doi:10.3390/agronomy15122759] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/328868]

Proline-Rich Specific Yeast Derivatives Enhance Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Water Status and Enable Reduced Irrigation Volumes

Tiwari, Harsh;Bonicelli, Pier Giorgio;Ripa, Clara;Poni, Stefano;Frioni, Tommaso
2025

Abstract

In plants, proline acts as a compatible osmolyte with multiple stress-related functions, contributing to cell turgor regulation and the dissipation of excess energy. In this study, the use of a proline-rich yeast derivative (SYD) on pot-grown grapevines cv. Chardonnay was tested as a priming strategy to enhance vine water status and water deficit tolerance. Well-watered control vines were compared to those subjected to reduced irrigation at 80% of daily evapotranspiration for 43 days, with and without foliar SYD applications. Additionally, a group of vines received only 40% of daily evapotranspiration (ET) along with foliar SYD applications. The soil moisture content clearly mirrored the three irrigation levels (full water, 80% ET, and 40% ET). However, considering vines kept at 80%ET, SYD-treated vines had a consistently higher midday leaf water potential than controls (+0.22 MPa on Day of Year-DOY-214). SYD-treated vines kept at 80% ET and control vines at 100% ET exhibited similar stomatal conductance and assimilation rates (0.24 vs. 0.25 mol m-2 s-1, and 14.9 vs. 15.3 mu mol m-2 s-1 on average from all measurements), while control vines kept at 80% ET lagged behind SYD-treated vines at 80% ET. On July 20th (DOY 201), in SYD-treated vines kept at 80% ET, leaves accumulated nearly twice the proline concentration compared to control vines receiving the same irrigation (17.7 vs. 10.6 mu mol/g). Treated vines kept at 40% ET had stomatal conductance and leaf assimilation rates comparable to control vines at 80% ET (0.17 vs. 0.20 mol m-2 s-1 and 11.7 vs. 11.5 mu mol m-2 s-1 on average). At harvest, the average yield of SYD-treated vines kept at 80% ET was similar to fully watered control vines maintained at 100% ET (1.75 vs. 1.82 kg), but showed higher soluble solids concentrations (20.9 degrees Brix, vs. 19 degrees Brix in fully watered control vines) and lower average titratable acidity (6.62 g/L vs. 7.7 g/L in fully watered control vines), while no differences were observed in the average titratable acidity between control vines kept at 80% ET and SYD-treated vines kept at 40% ET (6.15 g/L). Proline-rich SYD increased endogenous leaf proline levels and vine water status, also interacting with H2O2 accumulation, and resulted in long-term better physiological functioning at comparable water availability. The applications improved grapevine productive performance, effectively mitigating the negative impacts of reduced irrigation.
2025
Inglese
Tiwari, H., Bonicelli, P. G., Ripa, C., Poni, S., Battista, F., Frioni, T., Proline-Rich Specific Yeast Derivatives Enhance Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Water Status and Enable Reduced Irrigation Volumes, <<AGRONOMY>>, 2024; 15 (12): 1-19. [doi:10.3390/agronomy15122759] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/328868]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
agronomy-tiwari SYD.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 818.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
818.83 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/328868
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact