BACKGROUND: Red blood cell transfusions are commonly administered to anemic patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH); however, the optimal hemoglobin threshold to initiate transfusion is uncertain in this population. Therefore, we aimed to assess the impact of 2 different hemoglobin thresholds to guide transfusion on the neurological outcome of anemic critically ill patients with ICH. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter, phase 3 randomized study conducted in 72 intensive care units across 22 countries from 2017 to 2022. Eligible patients for the original trial had an acute brain injury, hemoglobin values <= 9 g/dL within the first 10 days after admission, and an expected intensive care unit stay of at least 72 hours; in this study, only patients with spontaneous ICH were assessed. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo a restrictive (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <= 7 g/dL) or a liberal (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <= 9 g/dL) strategy over a 28-day period. The primary outcome was the occurrence of an unfavorable neurological outcome, defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score of 1 to 5, at 180 days following randomization. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients with spontaneous ICH were analyzed: 45.8% of them were men with a mean age of 58.4 (SD, 13.4). Mean Glasgow Coma Scale on admission was 7.3 (SD, 3.3), and 75.7% of patients had a volume of hematoma >30 mL. Among all patients, 73 were randomized to the restrictive transfusion strategy, while 71 to the liberal one. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. At 180 days after randomization, patients assigned to the liberal transfusion strategy had a nonsignificant decrease in the probability of unfavorable neurological outcome (71.8 versus 84.7%; risk ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.71-1.01]; P=0.0 6). Also, the occurrence of the composite outcome (mortality and organ failure at day 28) was significantly lower in the liberal group (71.8% versus 87.7%, risk ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.69-0.97]; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: A liberal transfusion strategy was associated with a lower risk of mortality and organ failure, but not of unfavorable outcome in patients presenting with spontaneous ICH, compared with a restrictive strategy. However, the study cohort might have been underpowered to detect clinically relevant differences between the 2 interventions.[GRAPHICS];
Faso, C., Bogossian, E. G., Rynkowski, C. B., Moller, K., Lormans, P., Diaz, M. Q., Caricato, A., Dabrowski, W., Perez, I. G., Steblaj, S., Quintard, H., Justo, P., Righy, C., Roman-Pognuz, E., Huet, O., Mahmoodpoor, A., Blandino-Ortiz, A., Junttila, E., Funes, N., Izzo, G., Zattera, L., Giacomucci, A., Dibu, J., Rodrigues, A., Bouzat, P., Vincent, J. L., Taccone, F. S., A Restrictive Versus a Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Secondary Analysis of TRAIN Randomized Clinical Trial, <<STROKE>>, 2025; 56 (9): 2617-2626. [doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.050729] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/326938]
A Restrictive Versus a Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Secondary Analysis of TRAIN Randomized Clinical Trial
Caricato, AnselmoMembro del Collaboration Group
;
2025
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Red blood cell transfusions are commonly administered to anemic patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH); however, the optimal hemoglobin threshold to initiate transfusion is uncertain in this population. Therefore, we aimed to assess the impact of 2 different hemoglobin thresholds to guide transfusion on the neurological outcome of anemic critically ill patients with ICH. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter, phase 3 randomized study conducted in 72 intensive care units across 22 countries from 2017 to 2022. Eligible patients for the original trial had an acute brain injury, hemoglobin values <= 9 g/dL within the first 10 days after admission, and an expected intensive care unit stay of at least 72 hours; in this study, only patients with spontaneous ICH were assessed. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo a restrictive (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <= 7 g/dL) or a liberal (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <= 9 g/dL) strategy over a 28-day period. The primary outcome was the occurrence of an unfavorable neurological outcome, defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score of 1 to 5, at 180 days following randomization. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients with spontaneous ICH were analyzed: 45.8% of them were men with a mean age of 58.4 (SD, 13.4). Mean Glasgow Coma Scale on admission was 7.3 (SD, 3.3), and 75.7% of patients had a volume of hematoma >30 mL. Among all patients, 73 were randomized to the restrictive transfusion strategy, while 71 to the liberal one. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. At 180 days after randomization, patients assigned to the liberal transfusion strategy had a nonsignificant decrease in the probability of unfavorable neurological outcome (71.8 versus 84.7%; risk ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.71-1.01]; P=0.0 6). Also, the occurrence of the composite outcome (mortality and organ failure at day 28) was significantly lower in the liberal group (71.8% versus 87.7%, risk ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.69-0.97]; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: A liberal transfusion strategy was associated with a lower risk of mortality and organ failure, but not of unfavorable outcome in patients presenting with spontaneous ICH, compared with a restrictive strategy. However, the study cohort might have been underpowered to detect clinically relevant differences between the 2 interventions.[GRAPHICS];| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
faso-et-al-2025-a-restrictive-versus-a-liberal-transfusion-strategy-in-patients-with-spontaneous-intracerebral.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia file ?:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
477.98 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
477.98 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



