In the postdigital age, educational institutions are increasingly called to prevent and address hate speech. The Council of Europe’s Recommendation CM/Rec(2022)16 stresses the importance of countering forms of incitement that, although they are not illegal, threaten social cohesion, and democratic values. Teachers and educators must respond to both the polarization behind hate speech and the spread of misinformation in post-truth contexts. The different forms of hate on social media often share common psychological and social dynamics. Understanding these dynamics is essential for developing an educational approach that is realistic and culturally aware. Media education must combine critical thinking with a sense of responsibility—encouraging learners to reflect on the consequences of their actions in digital spaces. This chapter situates hate speech within debates on technological neutrality, balancing between instrumentalist and determinist perspectives. In the chapter, hate speech is defined as a “useful but ambiguous” concept, it is explored how digital environments enable its diffusion, and it is examined how the new informational regime transforms racist discourse. Ultimately, hate speech is reframed as a media-educational issue, to be addressed through the lens of “Onlife Citizenship” and the active role of prosumers.

Pasta, S., Countering Hate Speech in the Postdigital: A Challenge for ‘Onlife Citizenship’, in Gomez Paloma, F., Di Tore, P., Mangione, G. (ed.), Teacher Training and Student Learning - Past Values, Present Uncertainties and Future Prospects, IntechOpen, London 2025: 155- 174. 10.5772/intechopen.1005967 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/325717]

Countering Hate Speech in the Postdigital: A Challenge for ‘Onlife Citizenship’

Pasta, Stefano
2025

Abstract

In the postdigital age, educational institutions are increasingly called to prevent and address hate speech. The Council of Europe’s Recommendation CM/Rec(2022)16 stresses the importance of countering forms of incitement that, although they are not illegal, threaten social cohesion, and democratic values. Teachers and educators must respond to both the polarization behind hate speech and the spread of misinformation in post-truth contexts. The different forms of hate on social media often share common psychological and social dynamics. Understanding these dynamics is essential for developing an educational approach that is realistic and culturally aware. Media education must combine critical thinking with a sense of responsibility—encouraging learners to reflect on the consequences of their actions in digital spaces. This chapter situates hate speech within debates on technological neutrality, balancing between instrumentalist and determinist perspectives. In the chapter, hate speech is defined as a “useful but ambiguous” concept, it is explored how digital environments enable its diffusion, and it is examined how the new informational regime transforms racist discourse. Ultimately, hate speech is reframed as a media-educational issue, to be addressed through the lens of “Onlife Citizenship” and the active role of prosumers.
2025
Inglese
Teacher Training and Student Learning - Past Values, Present Uncertainties and Future Prospects
9781836348184
IntechOpen
  
Pasta, S., Countering Hate Speech in the Postdigital: A Challenge for ‘Onlife Citizenship’, in Gomez Paloma, F., Di Tore, P., Mangione, G. (ed.), Teacher Training and Student Learning - Past Values, Present Uncertainties and Future Prospects, IntechOpen, London 2025: 155- 174. 10.5772/intechopen.1005967 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/325717]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Final-Perspective Chapter Countering Hate Speech in the (2025-07-23 18_33_23).pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 397.78 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
397.78 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/325717
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact