IRIS PubliCatt
PubliCatt è il repository istituzionale ad accesso aperto dell'Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, dove gli utenti autorizzati afferenti all'Ateneo provvedono direttamente e autonomamente a depositare e a rendere visibili le proprie pubblicazioni, inserendo i dati descrittivi del documento stesso ("metadati", quali il titolo, autore, abstract, etc.) e, laddove possibile, il testo della pubblicazione stessa (full-text).
PubliCatt utilizza la piattaforma IRIS (Institutional Research Information System) sviluppata da CINECA.
EnglishIn this article, the author proposes that although treating clients humanistically may appear to be in conflict with the goal of objectivity in clinical assessment, they are not incompatible; and, indeed, as it is shown, the clinical psychologist has a responsibility to hold both goals in mind in order to achieve the most useful and accurate evaluations. Psychological assessment does not have to aim to remain exclusively in the realm of the “hard” sciences. Nor should assessment be relegated to the realm of pure subjectivity. The triangulation of narratives, particularly in collaborative assessment, provides a means of unifying theories, languages, and ways of producing knowledge and of being professionally responsible.
Aschieri, F., Epistemological and ethical challenges in standardized testing and collaborative assessment, <<JOURNAL OF HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY>>, 2012; (Luglio): 350-368. [doi:10.1177/0022167811422946] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/32504]
| Autori: | ||
| Titolo: | Epistemological and ethical challenges in standardized testing and collaborative assessment | |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022167811422946 | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2012 | |
| Abstract: | In this article, the author proposes that although treating clients humanistically may appear to be in conflict with the goal of objectivity in clinical assessment, they are not incompatible; and, indeed, as it is shown, the clinical psychologist has a responsibility to hold both goals in mind in order to achieve the most useful and accurate evaluations. Psychological assessment does not have to aim to remain exclusively in the realm of the “hard” sciences. Nor should assessment be relegated to the realm of pure subjectivity. The triangulation of narratives, particularly in collaborative assessment, provides a means of unifying theories, languages, and ways of producing knowledge and of being professionally responsible. | |
| Lingua: | Inglese | |
| Rivista: | ||
| Citazione: | Aschieri, F., Epistemological and ethical challenges in standardized testing and collaborative assessment, <<JOURNAL OF HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY>>, 2012; (Luglio): 350-368. [doi:10.1177/0022167811422946] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/32504] | |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza |
File in questo prodotto:
http://hdl.handle.net/10807/32504
Copyright © 2021