Background/Objectives: Psychological vulnerability in individuals with obesity represents a significant concern in the context of bariatric surgery. This study aimed to assess psychosocial functioning and identify the psychological, clinical, and sociodemographic predictors of impairment among patients undergoing preoperative evaluation. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients referred for bariatric surgery at a single academic medical center. Data were collected through clinical interviews and validated psychometric tools: the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Robust multiple regression analysis determined associations between CIA scores and psychological and demographic factors. Results: A total of 688 patients were evaluated (median age: 46 years; 70.3% female). Most had a high school education (56.9%) and were employed (69%). Elevated scores on the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) were significantly associated with female gender (β = 1.075, p = 0.029), moderate anxiety (GAD-7 ≥ 10; β = 3.85, p < 0.001), and severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 15; β = 16.67, p < 0.001). Other significant predictors included prior psychotherapy (β = 1.18, p = 0.044), aesthetic motivation for surgery (β = 0.92, p = 0.120), and expectations that weight loss would improve self-esteem (β = 2.11, p = 0.001) or social relationships (β = 1.98, p = 0.002). Conversely, physical activity was associated with lower CIA scores (β = –1.23, p = 0.050). The regression model showed strong explanatory power (McFadden R2 = 0.529). Conclusions: This study highlights key predictors of psychosocial distress in bariatric candidates, underscoring the importance of comprehensive psychological assessment before surgery. The CIA appears to be a valuable screening and monitoring tool. Future research should explore the longitudinal evolution of psychosocial functioning and support the integration of psychological care into multidisciplinary bariatric programs.

Magurano, M. R., Napolitano, D., Bozzetti, M., Lo Cascio, A., Oppo, L., Fernandez Tayupanta, L. A., Ferrazzoli, S., Lopasso, L., Rellini, E., Raffaelli, M., Chieffo, D. P. R., Psychological Assessment and Psychosocial Outcomes in Bariatric Surgery Candidates: A Retrospective Study, <<HEALTHCARE>>, 2025; 13 (11): 1-13. [doi:10.3390/healthcare13111294] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/322512]

Psychological Assessment and Psychosocial Outcomes in Bariatric Surgery Candidates: A Retrospective Study

Magurano, Maria Rosaria;Napolitano, Daniele;Bozzetti, Mattia;Lo Cascio, Alessio;Rellini, Emanuela;Raffaelli, Marco;Chieffo, Daniela Pia Rosaria
2025

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Psychological vulnerability in individuals with obesity represents a significant concern in the context of bariatric surgery. This study aimed to assess psychosocial functioning and identify the psychological, clinical, and sociodemographic predictors of impairment among patients undergoing preoperative evaluation. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients referred for bariatric surgery at a single academic medical center. Data were collected through clinical interviews and validated psychometric tools: the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Robust multiple regression analysis determined associations between CIA scores and psychological and demographic factors. Results: A total of 688 patients were evaluated (median age: 46 years; 70.3% female). Most had a high school education (56.9%) and were employed (69%). Elevated scores on the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) were significantly associated with female gender (β = 1.075, p = 0.029), moderate anxiety (GAD-7 ≥ 10; β = 3.85, p < 0.001), and severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 15; β = 16.67, p < 0.001). Other significant predictors included prior psychotherapy (β = 1.18, p = 0.044), aesthetic motivation for surgery (β = 0.92, p = 0.120), and expectations that weight loss would improve self-esteem (β = 2.11, p = 0.001) or social relationships (β = 1.98, p = 0.002). Conversely, physical activity was associated with lower CIA scores (β = –1.23, p = 0.050). The regression model showed strong explanatory power (McFadden R2 = 0.529). Conclusions: This study highlights key predictors of psychosocial distress in bariatric candidates, underscoring the importance of comprehensive psychological assessment before surgery. The CIA appears to be a valuable screening and monitoring tool. Future research should explore the longitudinal evolution of psychosocial functioning and support the integration of psychological care into multidisciplinary bariatric programs.
2025
Inglese
Magurano, M. R., Napolitano, D., Bozzetti, M., Lo Cascio, A., Oppo, L., Fernandez Tayupanta, L. A., Ferrazzoli, S., Lopasso, L., Rellini, E., Raffaelli, M., Chieffo, D. P. R., Psychological Assessment and Psychosocial Outcomes in Bariatric Surgery Candidates: A Retrospective Study, <<HEALTHCARE>>, 2025; 13 (11): 1-13. [doi:10.3390/healthcare13111294] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/322512]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/322512
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact