OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the effectiveness of various dural closure and bone reconstruction techniques in preventing CSF leakage following retrosigmoid craniotomy for cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors. The goal was to identify whether newer combinations of reconstructive materials offer any advantage in reducing CSF leaks and improv- ing surgical outcomes. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of 225 patients who underwent a retrosigmoid craniotomy for CPA neoplasms between January 2018 and August 2024. Patient demographics, intraoperative reports, and postopera- tive complications were analyzed. Various reconstructive methods, including the use of TachoSil, HydroSet, autologous or heterologous dural patches, and bone flap repositioning, were compared. CSF-related complications such as CSF leakage, infections, and postoperative hydrocephalus were systematically evaluated. RESULTS CSF leakage occurred in 31% of cases (n = 69), while CSF infections and postoperative hydrocephalus were noted in 6% and 7% of patients, respectively. HydroSet combined with bone flap repositioning significantly reduced CSF leakage (p = 0.008), as did the combination of HydroSet and heterologous dural patches (p = 0.007). TachoSil did not show a significant reduction in CSF leakage. Craniectomy with titanium mesh or heterologous cranioplasty was not as- sociated with any CSF leaks. No other single or combined techniques showed significant associations with CSF leakage. CONCLUSIONS HydroSet in combination with bone reconstruction and heterologous patches demonstrated superior outcomes in reducing CSF leaks. TachoSil did not significantly affect leakage rates, with less definite results. Refining surgical techniques and selecting appropriate materials for dural and bone reconstruction may help reduce complica- tions and improve patient outcomes in CPA tumor surgeries using the retrosigmoid approach.https://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2024.11.FOCUS24681

Auricchio, A. M., Martinelli, R., Offi, M., Nichelatti, M., Valeri, F., Rapisarda, A., Di Domenico, M., Montano, N., Olivi, A., Della Pepa, G. M., Dural and cranial reconstruction techniques in retrosigmoid craniotomy: key factors associated with CSF leaks in 225 patients, <<NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS>>, 2025; 58 (2): 1-7. [doi:10.3171/2024.11.FOCUS24681] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/316379]

Dural and cranial reconstruction techniques in retrosigmoid craniotomy: key factors associated with CSF leaks in 225 patients

Auricchio, Anna Maria
Primo
;
Martinelli, Renata
;
Offi, Martina;Valeri, Federico;Rapisarda, Alessandro;Montano, Nicola;Olivi, Alessandro;Della Pepa, Giuseppe Maria
2025

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the effectiveness of various dural closure and bone reconstruction techniques in preventing CSF leakage following retrosigmoid craniotomy for cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors. The goal was to identify whether newer combinations of reconstructive materials offer any advantage in reducing CSF leaks and improv- ing surgical outcomes. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of 225 patients who underwent a retrosigmoid craniotomy for CPA neoplasms between January 2018 and August 2024. Patient demographics, intraoperative reports, and postopera- tive complications were analyzed. Various reconstructive methods, including the use of TachoSil, HydroSet, autologous or heterologous dural patches, and bone flap repositioning, were compared. CSF-related complications such as CSF leakage, infections, and postoperative hydrocephalus were systematically evaluated. RESULTS CSF leakage occurred in 31% of cases (n = 69), while CSF infections and postoperative hydrocephalus were noted in 6% and 7% of patients, respectively. HydroSet combined with bone flap repositioning significantly reduced CSF leakage (p = 0.008), as did the combination of HydroSet and heterologous dural patches (p = 0.007). TachoSil did not show a significant reduction in CSF leakage. Craniectomy with titanium mesh or heterologous cranioplasty was not as- sociated with any CSF leaks. No other single or combined techniques showed significant associations with CSF leakage. CONCLUSIONS HydroSet in combination with bone reconstruction and heterologous patches demonstrated superior outcomes in reducing CSF leaks. TachoSil did not significantly affect leakage rates, with less definite results. Refining surgical techniques and selecting appropriate materials for dural and bone reconstruction may help reduce complica- tions and improve patient outcomes in CPA tumor surgeries using the retrosigmoid approach.https://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2024.11.FOCUS24681
2025
Inglese
Auricchio, A. M., Martinelli, R., Offi, M., Nichelatti, M., Valeri, F., Rapisarda, A., Di Domenico, M., Montano, N., Olivi, A., Della Pepa, G. M., Dural and cranial reconstruction techniques in retrosigmoid craniotomy: key factors associated with CSF leaks in 225 patients, <<NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS>>, 2025; 58 (2): 1-7. [doi:10.3171/2024.11.FOCUS24681] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/316379]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/316379
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact