Love is commonly hypothesized to function as an evolved commitment device, disincentivizing the pursuit of romantic alternatives and signaling this motivational shift to a partner. Here, we test this possibility against a novel signaling-to-alternatives account, in which love instead operates by dissuading alternatives from pursuing oneself. Overall, we find stronger support for the latter account. In Studies 1 and 2, we find that partner quality relative to alternatives positively predicts feelings of love, and love fails to mitigate the negative effects of desirable alternatives on relationship satisfaction contradicting the classic commitment device account. In Study 3, using a longitudinal design, we replicate these effects and find that changes in partner quality relative to alternatives predict changes in love over time. In Study 4, we replicate the relationship between love and relative partner quality across 44 countries. In Study 5, we find a nearly one-to-one correspondence between the extent to which partner-directed actions are diagnostic of love and reductions in romantic alternatives’ attraction to the actor. These results suggest that love may not act as a commitment device in the classic sense by disincentivizing the pursuit of alternatives but by disincentivizing alternatives from pursuing oneself.

Gelbarta, B., Waltera, K. V., Conroy-Beama, D., Estorque, C., Buss, D. M., Asao, K., Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., Aavik, T., Akello, G., Madallh Alhabahba, M., Alm, C., Amjad, N., Anjum, A., Atama, C. S., Atamtürk Duyar, D., Batres, C., Bendixen, M., Bensafia, A., Bizumic, B., Boussena, M., Butovskaya, M., Can, S., Carrier, A., Cetinkaya, H., Croy, I., María Cueto, R., Czub, M., Dronova, D., Dural, S., Duyar, I., Ertugrul, B., Espinosa, A., Estevan, I., Sofia Esteves, C., Fang, L., Frackowiak, T., Contreras Garduno, J., Ugalde Gonzalez, K., Guemaz, F., Gyuris, P., Herak, I., Hromatko, I., Hui, C., Laile Jaafar, J., Jiang, F., Kafetsios, K., Kavcic, T., Edward Ottesen Kennair, L., Kervyn, N., Thi Khanh Ha, T., Ahmed Khilji, I., Moc Lanam, H., Lang, A., Lennard, G. R., Leon, E., Lindhol, T., Thi Linh, T., Lopez, G., Van Luot, N., Mailhos, A., Manesi, Z., Mckerchar, S. L., Mesko, N., Misra, G., Monaghan, C., Mora, E. C., Moya-Garofano, A., Musil, B., Carlos Natividade, J., Niemczyk, A., Nizharadze, G., Oberzaucher, E., Oleszkiewicz, A., Sofian Omar-Fauzee, M., Onyishi, I. E., Ozener, B., Pagani, A. F., Pakalniskiene, V., Parise, M., Pazhoohi, F., Pisanski, A., Pisanski, K., Plohl, N., Ponciano, E., Popa, C., Prokop, P., Rizwan, M., Salkicevic, S., Sargautyte, R., Sarmany-Schuller, I., Sharad, S., Sultan Siddiqui, R., Simonetti, F., Yordanova Stoyanova, S., Tadinac, M., Antonio Correa Varella, M., Vauclair, C., Diego Vega, L., Ajeng Widarini, D., Yoo, G., Zatkova, M., Zupancic, M., The function of love: A signaling-to-alternatives account of the commitment device hypothesis, <<EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR>>, 2025; 2025 (46): 1-15. [doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106672] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/314239]

The function of love: A signaling-to-alternatives account of the commitment device hypothesis

Lopez, Giulia;Pagani, Ariela Francesca;Parise, Miriam;
2025

Abstract

Love is commonly hypothesized to function as an evolved commitment device, disincentivizing the pursuit of romantic alternatives and signaling this motivational shift to a partner. Here, we test this possibility against a novel signaling-to-alternatives account, in which love instead operates by dissuading alternatives from pursuing oneself. Overall, we find stronger support for the latter account. In Studies 1 and 2, we find that partner quality relative to alternatives positively predicts feelings of love, and love fails to mitigate the negative effects of desirable alternatives on relationship satisfaction contradicting the classic commitment device account. In Study 3, using a longitudinal design, we replicate these effects and find that changes in partner quality relative to alternatives predict changes in love over time. In Study 4, we replicate the relationship between love and relative partner quality across 44 countries. In Study 5, we find a nearly one-to-one correspondence between the extent to which partner-directed actions are diagnostic of love and reductions in romantic alternatives’ attraction to the actor. These results suggest that love may not act as a commitment device in the classic sense by disincentivizing the pursuit of alternatives but by disincentivizing alternatives from pursuing oneself.
2025
Inglese
Gelbarta, B., Waltera, K. V., Conroy-Beama, D., Estorque, C., Buss, D. M., Asao, K., Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., Aavik, T., Akello, G., Madallh Alhabahba, M., Alm, C., Amjad, N., Anjum, A., Atama, C. S., Atamtürk Duyar, D., Batres, C., Bendixen, M., Bensafia, A., Bizumic, B., Boussena, M., Butovskaya, M., Can, S., Carrier, A., Cetinkaya, H., Croy, I., María Cueto, R., Czub, M., Dronova, D., Dural, S., Duyar, I., Ertugrul, B., Espinosa, A., Estevan, I., Sofia Esteves, C., Fang, L., Frackowiak, T., Contreras Garduno, J., Ugalde Gonzalez, K., Guemaz, F., Gyuris, P., Herak, I., Hromatko, I., Hui, C., Laile Jaafar, J., Jiang, F., Kafetsios, K., Kavcic, T., Edward Ottesen Kennair, L., Kervyn, N., Thi Khanh Ha, T., Ahmed Khilji, I., Moc Lanam, H., Lang, A., Lennard, G. R., Leon, E., Lindhol, T., Thi Linh, T., Lopez, G., Van Luot, N., Mailhos, A., Manesi, Z., Mckerchar, S. L., Mesko, N., Misra, G., Monaghan, C., Mora, E. C., Moya-Garofano, A., Musil, B., Carlos Natividade, J., Niemczyk, A., Nizharadze, G., Oberzaucher, E., Oleszkiewicz, A., Sofian Omar-Fauzee, M., Onyishi, I. E., Ozener, B., Pagani, A. F., Pakalniskiene, V., Parise, M., Pazhoohi, F., Pisanski, A., Pisanski, K., Plohl, N., Ponciano, E., Popa, C., Prokop, P., Rizwan, M., Salkicevic, S., Sargautyte, R., Sarmany-Schuller, I., Sharad, S., Sultan Siddiqui, R., Simonetti, F., Yordanova Stoyanova, S., Tadinac, M., Antonio Correa Varella, M., Vauclair, C., Diego Vega, L., Ajeng Widarini, D., Yoo, G., Zatkova, M., Zupancic, M., The function of love: A signaling-to-alternatives account of the commitment device hypothesis, <<EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR>>, 2025; 2025 (46): 1-15. [doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106672] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/314239]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/314239
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact