BackgroundAdvances in STN-DBS technology, among which directional stimulation, improved Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment efficacy, while increasing the clinical programming complexity. Lead localization software may aid the stimulation contact selection process.ObjectiveWe aimed to assess the concordance between imaging-suggested (IGP) and conventional-programming (CP) selected stimulation contacts one year after surgery and its impact on motor outcomes.MethodsSixty-four PD patients with bilateral STN-DBS were enrolled. Lead localization was reconstructed with BrainlabTM software. For each electrode, the vertical contact level and, when applicable, the directionality predicted by the lead reconstruction software to be the most effective were established and compared to the stimulation parameters clinically activated one-year post-surgery. IGP/CP concordance ratio was calculated for both stimulation level and directional contacts. Post-operative modifications of PD motor symptoms severity were compared among groups of concordant and discordant IGP/CP programming.ResultsOne-year post-surgery, IGP/CP concordance was 80% for active stimulation vertical contact level and 51% for directionality. No significant difference in motor outcomes was found between IGP/CP concordant and discordant patients for contact level activation, whereas patients with concordant IGP/CP active directional stimulation (c-Direction) showed superior motor outcomes at one-year follow-up than those discordant (d-Direction) (UPDRS-III stimulation-induced improvement: c-Direction = -25.66 ± 13.74 vs. d-Direction = -12.54 ± 11.86; p = 0.011).ConclusionsVisual reconstruction software correctly predicted the most clinically effective stimulation contact levels in most patients. Imaging therefore facilitates classic STN-DBS clinical programming while assuring similar outcomes. Moreover, better motor outcomes were reached by patients with concordant IGP/CP directional parameters, suggesting that visualization can represent an added value in particular for directional stimulation programming.
Rigon, L., Bove, F., Izzo, A., Montano, N., Brusa, L., Cerroni, R., De Biase, A., Di Biase, L., D'Alessandris, Q. G., Genovese, D., Pecoraro, P. M., Peppe, A., Rizzo, M., Stefani, A., Suppa, A., Bentivoglio, A. R., Calabresi, P., Piano, C., Concordance between imaging and clinical based STN-DBS programming improves motor outcomes of directional stimulation in Parkinson's disease, <<JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE>>, 2025; 15 (2): 409-420. [doi:10.1177/1877718X241305725] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/312877]
Concordance between imaging and clinical based STN-DBS programming improves motor outcomes of directional stimulation in Parkinson's disease
Bove, Francesco;Izzo, Alessandro;Montano, Nicola;De Biase, Alessandro;D'Alessandris, Quintino Giorgio;Genovese, Danilo;Bentivoglio, Anna Rita;Calabresi, Paolo;Piano, Carla
2025
Abstract
BackgroundAdvances in STN-DBS technology, among which directional stimulation, improved Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment efficacy, while increasing the clinical programming complexity. Lead localization software may aid the stimulation contact selection process.ObjectiveWe aimed to assess the concordance between imaging-suggested (IGP) and conventional-programming (CP) selected stimulation contacts one year after surgery and its impact on motor outcomes.MethodsSixty-four PD patients with bilateral STN-DBS were enrolled. Lead localization was reconstructed with BrainlabTM software. For each electrode, the vertical contact level and, when applicable, the directionality predicted by the lead reconstruction software to be the most effective were established and compared to the stimulation parameters clinically activated one-year post-surgery. IGP/CP concordance ratio was calculated for both stimulation level and directional contacts. Post-operative modifications of PD motor symptoms severity were compared among groups of concordant and discordant IGP/CP programming.ResultsOne-year post-surgery, IGP/CP concordance was 80% for active stimulation vertical contact level and 51% for directionality. No significant difference in motor outcomes was found between IGP/CP concordant and discordant patients for contact level activation, whereas patients with concordant IGP/CP active directional stimulation (c-Direction) showed superior motor outcomes at one-year follow-up than those discordant (d-Direction) (UPDRS-III stimulation-induced improvement: c-Direction = -25.66 ± 13.74 vs. d-Direction = -12.54 ± 11.86; p = 0.011).ConclusionsVisual reconstruction software correctly predicted the most clinically effective stimulation contact levels in most patients. Imaging therefore facilitates classic STN-DBS clinical programming while assuring similar outcomes. Moreover, better motor outcomes were reached by patients with concordant IGP/CP directional parameters, suggesting that visualization can represent an added value in particular for directional stimulation programming.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
