Problem statement: CrossFit® has rapidly grown into a global fitness phenomenon, but its expansion has raised concerns about injury risks, overtraining, and long-term physiological impacts. Critics point to high injury rates among novices, sex-specific physiological adaptations, and the necessity personalized programming to optimize both performance and safety. Approach: This review synthesizes evidence from peer-reviewed studies to provide a multidisciplinary analysis of CrossFit®. It examines physiological adaptations (cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, hormonal responses), psychological benefits (motivation, cognitive function), and associated risks (injuries, overtraining). Additionally, it propose evidence-based strategies for injury prevention and recovery, integrating biomechanical, metabolic, and psychosocial perspectives. Purpose: The study aims to guide practitioners, coaches, and researchers in optimizing CrossFit® training by bridging scientific insights with practical applications. It emphasizes the need for structured programming, technological innovation, and sex-specific research to enhance safety and efficacy. Results: CrossFit® significantly improves cardiorespiratory fitness (peak VO₂ ~47–49 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹), muscular strength (14% increase in front squat performance), and body composition (3.19 kg fat loss). Psychologically, it fosters mental resilience, social connectivity (78% adherence linked to community support), and acute cognitive improvements (12–15% in working memory). However, injury risks persist, particularly shoulder (25%) and knee (18%) injuries, driven by technical flaws and excessive intensity. Sex-specific adaptations include higher testosterone surges in males (421–564 vs. 29–45 pg/mL in females) and superior fatigue resistance in females. Periodization reduces injury risk by 35%, while recovery strategies (e.g., protein intake, sleep optimization) mitigate muscle damage (25% lower creatine kinase levels). Conclusions: CrossFit® offers transformative physical and psychological benefits when executed mindfully. Structured periodization, technique prioritization, and recovery protocols are critical to minimizing risks. Future integration of wearable technology and AI-driven analytics can personalize training, while longitudinal studies must address sex-specific and long-term health outcomes. By balancing intensity with recovery and fostering inclusive communities, CrossFit® can sustainably promote holistic well-being.

Cereda, F., CrossFit®: A multidimensional analysis of physiological adaptations, psychological benefits, and strategic considerations for optimal training, <<JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT>>, 2025; 25 (3): 601-610. [doi:10.7752/jpes.2025.03065] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/309738]

CrossFit®: A multidimensional analysis of physiological adaptations, psychological benefits, and strategic considerations for optimal training

Cereda, Ferdinando
Primo
Writing – Review & Editing
2025

Abstract

Problem statement: CrossFit® has rapidly grown into a global fitness phenomenon, but its expansion has raised concerns about injury risks, overtraining, and long-term physiological impacts. Critics point to high injury rates among novices, sex-specific physiological adaptations, and the necessity personalized programming to optimize both performance and safety. Approach: This review synthesizes evidence from peer-reviewed studies to provide a multidisciplinary analysis of CrossFit®. It examines physiological adaptations (cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, hormonal responses), psychological benefits (motivation, cognitive function), and associated risks (injuries, overtraining). Additionally, it propose evidence-based strategies for injury prevention and recovery, integrating biomechanical, metabolic, and psychosocial perspectives. Purpose: The study aims to guide practitioners, coaches, and researchers in optimizing CrossFit® training by bridging scientific insights with practical applications. It emphasizes the need for structured programming, technological innovation, and sex-specific research to enhance safety and efficacy. Results: CrossFit® significantly improves cardiorespiratory fitness (peak VO₂ ~47–49 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹), muscular strength (14% increase in front squat performance), and body composition (3.19 kg fat loss). Psychologically, it fosters mental resilience, social connectivity (78% adherence linked to community support), and acute cognitive improvements (12–15% in working memory). However, injury risks persist, particularly shoulder (25%) and knee (18%) injuries, driven by technical flaws and excessive intensity. Sex-specific adaptations include higher testosterone surges in males (421–564 vs. 29–45 pg/mL in females) and superior fatigue resistance in females. Periodization reduces injury risk by 35%, while recovery strategies (e.g., protein intake, sleep optimization) mitigate muscle damage (25% lower creatine kinase levels). Conclusions: CrossFit® offers transformative physical and psychological benefits when executed mindfully. Structured periodization, technique prioritization, and recovery protocols are critical to minimizing risks. Future integration of wearable technology and AI-driven analytics can personalize training, while longitudinal studies must address sex-specific and long-term health outcomes. By balancing intensity with recovery and fostering inclusive communities, CrossFit® can sustainably promote holistic well-being.
2025
Inglese
Cereda, F., CrossFit®: A multidimensional analysis of physiological adaptations, psychological benefits, and strategic considerations for optimal training, <<JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT>>, 2025; 25 (3): 601-610. [doi:10.7752/jpes.2025.03065] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/309738]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/309738
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact