In this paper I shall examine the most representative authors of two important trends that dominated the classical-metaphysical debate in Italy during the second half of the XX century. On a hand, the conception of being qua perfection of all perfections, transcendental and analogical, which is closer to Aquinas’ written doctrine. On the other, the univocity of a notion of being that it is basically equalized to that of existence. Which stance appears more suitable to cope with modern and contemporary critiques today? What I am aiming to do in this paper is to show that metaphysical knowledge can be rephrased in a way that it is able to overcome a number of rigidnesses that are present in both the aforementioned settings.

Sacchi, D. M., Tomismo essenziale e filosofia neoclassica a confronto. Cornelio Fabro e Gustavo Bontadini, <<ESPÍRITU>>, 2024; LXXIII (167): 13-30 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/303941]

Tomismo essenziale e filosofia neoclassica a confronto. Cornelio Fabro e Gustavo Bontadini

Sacchi, Dario Marco
2024

Abstract

In this paper I shall examine the most representative authors of two important trends that dominated the classical-metaphysical debate in Italy during the second half of the XX century. On a hand, the conception of being qua perfection of all perfections, transcendental and analogical, which is closer to Aquinas’ written doctrine. On the other, the univocity of a notion of being that it is basically equalized to that of existence. Which stance appears more suitable to cope with modern and contemporary critiques today? What I am aiming to do in this paper is to show that metaphysical knowledge can be rephrased in a way that it is able to overcome a number of rigidnesses that are present in both the aforementioned settings.
2024
Italiano
Sacchi, D. M., Tomismo essenziale e filosofia neoclassica a confronto. Cornelio Fabro e Gustavo Bontadini, <<ESPÍRITU>>, 2024; LXXIII (167): 13-30 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/303941]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/303941
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact