The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for all cancer sites, including gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), is meant to be dynamic, requiring periodic updates to optimize AJCC staging definitions. This entails the collaboration of experts charged with evaluating new evidence that supports changes to each staging system. GEP-NETs are the second most prevalent neoplasm of gastrointestinal origin after colorectal cancer. Since publication of the AJCC eighth edition, the World Health Organization has updated the classification and separates grade 3 GEP-NETs from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. In addition, because of major advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies for GEP-NETs, AJCC version 9 advocates against the use of serum chromogranin A for the diagnosis and monitoring of GEP-NETs. Furthermore, AJCC version 9 recognizes the increasing role of endoscopy and endoscopic resection in the diagnosis and management of NETs, particularly in the stomach, duodenum, and colorectum. Finally, T1NXM0 has been added to stage I in these disease sites as well as in the appendix.

Chauhan, A., Chan, K., Halfdanarson, T. R., Bellizzi, A. M., Rindi, G., O'Toole, D., Ge, P. S., Jain, D., Dasari, A., Anaya, D. A., Bergsland, E., Mittra, E., Wei, A. C., Hope, T. A., Kendi, A. T., Thomas, S. M., Flem, S., Brierley, J., Asare, E. A., Washington, K., Shi, C., Critical updates in neuroendocrine tumors: Version 9 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, <<Ca. A cancer journal for clinicians>>, 2024; 74 (4): 359-367. [doi:10.3322/caac.21840] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/301969]

Critical updates in neuroendocrine tumors: Version 9 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Rindi, Guido;
2024

Abstract

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for all cancer sites, including gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), is meant to be dynamic, requiring periodic updates to optimize AJCC staging definitions. This entails the collaboration of experts charged with evaluating new evidence that supports changes to each staging system. GEP-NETs are the second most prevalent neoplasm of gastrointestinal origin after colorectal cancer. Since publication of the AJCC eighth edition, the World Health Organization has updated the classification and separates grade 3 GEP-NETs from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. In addition, because of major advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies for GEP-NETs, AJCC version 9 advocates against the use of serum chromogranin A for the diagnosis and monitoring of GEP-NETs. Furthermore, AJCC version 9 recognizes the increasing role of endoscopy and endoscopic resection in the diagnosis and management of NETs, particularly in the stomach, duodenum, and colorectum. Finally, T1NXM0 has been added to stage I in these disease sites as well as in the appendix.
2024
Inglese
Chauhan, A., Chan, K., Halfdanarson, T. R., Bellizzi, A. M., Rindi, G., O'Toole, D., Ge, P. S., Jain, D., Dasari, A., Anaya, D. A., Bergsland, E., Mittra, E., Wei, A. C., Hope, T. A., Kendi, A. T., Thomas, S. M., Flem, S., Brierley, J., Asare, E. A., Washington, K., Shi, C., Critical updates in neuroendocrine tumors: Version 9 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, <<Ca. A cancer journal for clinicians>>, 2024; 74 (4): 359-367. [doi:10.3322/caac.21840] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/301969]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Critical updates in neuroendocrine tumors Version 9 American Joint Committee.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 980.12 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
980.12 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/301969
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact