Objective: To evaluate the clinical course, respiratory outcomes and markers of infl ammation in preterm infants with moderate respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) assigned from birth to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or bi-level NCPAP. Methods: A total of 40 infants with a gestational age (GA) of 28–34 weeks (<35 weeks’ GA), affected by moderate RDS, were considered eligible and were randomised to NCPAP (group A; n=20, CPAP level=6 cm H2O) or to bi-level NCPAP (group B; n=20, lower CPAP level=4.5 cm H2O, higher CPAP level=8 cm H2O), provided with variable fl ow devices. Inflammatory response was the primary outcome; serum cytokines were measured on days 1 and 7 of life. Length of ventilation, oxygen dependency, need for intubation and occurrence of air leaks were considered as secondary outcomes. Results: Infants showed similar characteristics at birth (group A vs group B: GA 30.3±2 vs 30.2±2 weeks, birth weight 1429±545 vs 1411±560 g) and showed similar serum cytokine levels at all times. Group A underwent longer respiratory support (6.2±2 days vs 3.8±1 days, p=0.025), longer O2 dependency (13.8±8 days vs 6.5±4 days, p=0.027) and was discharged later (GA at discharge 36.7±2.5 weeks vs 35.6±1.2 weeks, p=0.02). All infants survived. No bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) or neurological disorders occurred. Conclusions: Bi-level NCPAP was associated with better respiratory outcomes versus NCPAP, and allowed earlier discharge, inducing the same changes in the cytokine levels. It was found to be well tolerated and safe in the study population.

Mancuso, D. A., Castoldi, F., Fontana, P., Daniele, I., Cavigioli, F., Rossi, S., Reali, R., Lista, G., Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial., <<ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD. FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION>>, 2010; 95 (2): 85-89. [doi:10.1136/adc.2009.169219] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/2997]

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial.

Mancuso;
2010

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical course, respiratory outcomes and markers of infl ammation in preterm infants with moderate respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) assigned from birth to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or bi-level NCPAP. Methods: A total of 40 infants with a gestational age (GA) of 28–34 weeks (<35 weeks’ GA), affected by moderate RDS, were considered eligible and were randomised to NCPAP (group A; n=20, CPAP level=6 cm H2O) or to bi-level NCPAP (group B; n=20, lower CPAP level=4.5 cm H2O, higher CPAP level=8 cm H2O), provided with variable fl ow devices. Inflammatory response was the primary outcome; serum cytokines were measured on days 1 and 7 of life. Length of ventilation, oxygen dependency, need for intubation and occurrence of air leaks were considered as secondary outcomes. Results: Infants showed similar characteristics at birth (group A vs group B: GA 30.3±2 vs 30.2±2 weeks, birth weight 1429±545 vs 1411±560 g) and showed similar serum cytokine levels at all times. Group A underwent longer respiratory support (6.2±2 days vs 3.8±1 days, p=0.025), longer O2 dependency (13.8±8 days vs 6.5±4 days, p=0.027) and was discharged later (GA at discharge 36.7±2.5 weeks vs 35.6±1.2 weeks, p=0.02). All infants survived. No bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) or neurological disorders occurred. Conclusions: Bi-level NCPAP was associated with better respiratory outcomes versus NCPAP, and allowed earlier discharge, inducing the same changes in the cytokine levels. It was found to be well tolerated and safe in the study population.
Inglese
Mancuso, D. A., Castoldi, F., Fontana, P., Daniele, I., Cavigioli, F., Rossi, S., Reali, R., Lista, G., Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial., <<ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD. FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION>>, 2010; 95 (2): 85-89. [doi:10.1136/adc.2009.169219] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/2997]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/2997
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 74
social impact