Background: Italy has seen limited growth and institutionalization of clinical ethics activities in its territory. Only a few observational studies were conducted in Italy to assess the state of the art of clinical ethics services and activities. Aim: We sought to gain a broad and comprehensive understanding of the state of the art as perceived by Italian healthcare institutions and facilities. Methods: We prepared a questionnaire comprising of twelve close-ended and six open-ended questions. We sent it to all Local Healthcare Authorities (Aziende Sanitarie Locali, ASL), all private Scientific Institutes for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, IRCCS), and all hospices throughout Italy. Out of 380 facilities, 90 of them (22.5%) responded to it. Results: All answers revealed interesting data. Among them, the ones that stood are: when asked who they turn to when an ethical dilemma arises, 27.7% of the respondents checked more than two answers, thus showing that there is not one clear and unequivocal body of reference. When asked if there are standard procedures, 55.4% of the respondents declared that there are no standard procedures. Only 4.4% of respondents declared the method of analysis being used. 53.3% responded that their hospital or healthcare facility does not regularly offer training activities and formation to deal with ethical dilemmas Conclusion: The three topics that stand out are a great fragmentation, the need to formalize and establish dedicated services to take care of ethical dilemmas and to offer training and formation to healthcare providers.
Raimondi, C., Refolo, P., Spagnolo, A. G., The current scenario of clinical ethics in Italy, <<MEDICINA E MORALE>>, 2024; 73 (2): 177-199. [doi:10.4081/mem.2024.1295] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/299443]
The current scenario of clinical ethics in Italy
Raimondi, Costanza;Refolo, Pietro;Spagnolo, Antonio Gioacchino
2024
Abstract
Background: Italy has seen limited growth and institutionalization of clinical ethics activities in its territory. Only a few observational studies were conducted in Italy to assess the state of the art of clinical ethics services and activities. Aim: We sought to gain a broad and comprehensive understanding of the state of the art as perceived by Italian healthcare institutions and facilities. Methods: We prepared a questionnaire comprising of twelve close-ended and six open-ended questions. We sent it to all Local Healthcare Authorities (Aziende Sanitarie Locali, ASL), all private Scientific Institutes for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, IRCCS), and all hospices throughout Italy. Out of 380 facilities, 90 of them (22.5%) responded to it. Results: All answers revealed interesting data. Among them, the ones that stood are: when asked who they turn to when an ethical dilemma arises, 27.7% of the respondents checked more than two answers, thus showing that there is not one clear and unequivocal body of reference. When asked if there are standard procedures, 55.4% of the respondents declared that there are no standard procedures. Only 4.4% of respondents declared the method of analysis being used. 53.3% responded that their hospital or healthcare facility does not regularly offer training activities and formation to deal with ethical dilemmas Conclusion: The three topics that stand out are a great fragmentation, the need to formalize and establish dedicated services to take care of ethical dilemmas and to offer training and formation to healthcare providers.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.