Introduction. In the last 25 years, random trials on the advantages of combined surgery and irradiation/chemotherapy of breast cancer demonstrated similar survival rates to those of massive surgery. However, both irradiation and chemotherapy have advanced and now yield good local control of the disease, so that even large breast cancers can be made operable. Breast cancer follow-up is carried out with imaging and clinical examinations to detect early locoregional recurrences, contralateral lesions and distant recurrences: to this purpose, we carried out a comparative study of all imaging modalities. Material and methods. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 42 breast cancer (T2-T3 NO-N+) patients of the Senology Center of the Catholic University (Rome, Italy) treated with irradiation and/or chemotherapy for tumor debulking to permit conservative surgery. We investigated the sensitivity and the indications of mammography, B-mode and color Doppler US and MRI in measuring the exact tumor size and detecting locoregional metastatic nodes. Results. After 3 years' treatment, our recurrence rate (19%) is a little higher than those in the major international trials (4.2-9% and 5 tears). The recurrence was on the surgical scar in 75% of cases (6/8), while multifocal tumors were found in 25% of cases. US was the most accurate method in measuring tumor size in 90% of cases (18/20), while mammography frequently overstaged the lesion and yielded exact measurements in 65% of cases (13/20). MRI was as accurate as US, but this technique is too expensive and little available in Italy. US accurately diagnosed lymph node recurrences (70% sensitivity), but MR rate was even higher (80%), while mammography and color Doppler US had only 5-10%. As for treatment outcome, an irregular and blurred nodule or multifocal lesions at mammography indicate poor/no response, while a much smaller radial scar than at previous similar follow-ups indicates treatment success. Conclusions. When correctly integrated, mammographic, US and MR patterns permit exact tumor size measurement and show possible locoregional lymph node involvement in the patients submitted to conservative surgery and irradiation/chemotherapy. In contrast, color Doppler findings remain poorly specific in this disease, with about 55% sensitivity. Therefore, radiologic studies, with clinical and laboratory data, have a major prognostic value in assessing the biological response to combined treatment.

Bock, E., Bock, C., Belli, P., Campioni, P., Manfredi, R., Pastore, G., (Abstract) Breast diagnostic imaging in the patients submitted to postoperative irradiation or preoperative irradiation/chemotherapy, <<LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA>>, 1998; 95 (1-2): 38-43 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/298426]

Breast diagnostic imaging in the patients submitted to postoperative irradiation or preoperative irradiation/chemotherapy

Bock, Caterina;Belli, Paolo;Manfredi, Riccardo;
1998

Abstract

Introduction. In the last 25 years, random trials on the advantages of combined surgery and irradiation/chemotherapy of breast cancer demonstrated similar survival rates to those of massive surgery. However, both irradiation and chemotherapy have advanced and now yield good local control of the disease, so that even large breast cancers can be made operable. Breast cancer follow-up is carried out with imaging and clinical examinations to detect early locoregional recurrences, contralateral lesions and distant recurrences: to this purpose, we carried out a comparative study of all imaging modalities. Material and methods. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 42 breast cancer (T2-T3 NO-N+) patients of the Senology Center of the Catholic University (Rome, Italy) treated with irradiation and/or chemotherapy for tumor debulking to permit conservative surgery. We investigated the sensitivity and the indications of mammography, B-mode and color Doppler US and MRI in measuring the exact tumor size and detecting locoregional metastatic nodes. Results. After 3 years' treatment, our recurrence rate (19%) is a little higher than those in the major international trials (4.2-9% and 5 tears). The recurrence was on the surgical scar in 75% of cases (6/8), while multifocal tumors were found in 25% of cases. US was the most accurate method in measuring tumor size in 90% of cases (18/20), while mammography frequently overstaged the lesion and yielded exact measurements in 65% of cases (13/20). MRI was as accurate as US, but this technique is too expensive and little available in Italy. US accurately diagnosed lymph node recurrences (70% sensitivity), but MR rate was even higher (80%), while mammography and color Doppler US had only 5-10%. As for treatment outcome, an irregular and blurred nodule or multifocal lesions at mammography indicate poor/no response, while a much smaller radial scar than at previous similar follow-ups indicates treatment success. Conclusions. When correctly integrated, mammographic, US and MR patterns permit exact tumor size measurement and show possible locoregional lymph node involvement in the patients submitted to conservative surgery and irradiation/chemotherapy. In contrast, color Doppler findings remain poorly specific in this disease, with about 55% sensitivity. Therefore, radiologic studies, with clinical and laboratory data, have a major prognostic value in assessing the biological response to combined treatment.
1998
Italiano
Bock, E., Bock, C., Belli, P., Campioni, P., Manfredi, R., Pastore, G., (Abstract) Breast diagnostic imaging in the patients submitted to postoperative irradiation or preoperative irradiation/chemotherapy, <<LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA>>, 1998; 95 (1-2): 38-43 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/298426]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/298426
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact