The 2003 Italian Corporate Reform Law, establishing one-tier vs two-tier board for listed and unlisted joint stock companies, introduced an alternative corporate governance system. This study implements probit regressions in order to compare 548 unlisted firms: corporations with better performance in sales and capital structure, as well as those subject to control and coordination , maintain a traditional system. Conversely, firms with a high proportion of individual shareholders adopt alternative systems. For alternative systems' firms, split between one-tier and two-tier boards, companies subjected to control and coordination action tend to implement a one-tier system, same as firms with a higher proportion of individual shareholders.
Bellavite Pellegrini, C., Pellegrini, L., Sironi, E., Alternative vs Traditional Corporate Governance Systems in Italy: An Empirical Analysis, <<PROBLEMS & PERSPECTIVES IN MANAGEMENT>>, 2010; issue 3 (Volume 8, issue 3, 2010): 4-15 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/29690]
Alternative vs Traditional Corporate Governance Systems in Italy: An Empirical Analysis
Bellavite Pellegrini, Carlo;Pellegrini, Laura;Sironi, Emiliano
2010
Abstract
The 2003 Italian Corporate Reform Law, establishing one-tier vs two-tier board for listed and unlisted joint stock companies, introduced an alternative corporate governance system. This study implements probit regressions in order to compare 548 unlisted firms: corporations with better performance in sales and capital structure, as well as those subject to control and coordination , maintain a traditional system. Conversely, firms with a high proportion of individual shareholders adopt alternative systems. For alternative systems' firms, split between one-tier and two-tier boards, companies subjected to control and coordination action tend to implement a one-tier system, same as firms with a higher proportion of individual shareholders.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.