The authors regret an inconsistency in the reported quality of evidence for Key Question 4 concerning whether neurosurgical aspiration or excision should be used in patients with brain abscess. The reported quality of evidence was described as “low” in the abstract and Table 1 and should instead be “moderate” as stated in the main text. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Bodilsen, J., D'Alessandris, Q. G., Humphreys, H., Iro, M. A., Klein, M., Last, K., Montesinos, I. L., Pagliano, P., Sipahi, O. R., San-Juan, R., Tattevin, P., Thurnher, M., De, J. T. R., Brouwer, M. C., Corrigendum to “European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of brain abscess in children and adults” [Clin Microbiol and Infect 30(1) (2024 Jan) 66–89 Doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.016] (Clinical Microbiology and Infection (2024) 30(1) (66–89), (S1198743X23003993), (10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.016)), <<CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION>>, 2024; 30 (5): 698-698. [doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2024.01.026] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/289661]
Corrigendum to “European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of brain abscess in children and adults” [Clin Microbiol and Infect 30(1) (2024 Jan) 66–89 Doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.016] (Clinical Microbiology and Infection (2024) 30(1) (66–89), (S1198743X23003993), (10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.016))
D'Alessandris, Quintino Giorgio;
2024
Abstract
The authors regret an inconsistency in the reported quality of evidence for Key Question 4 concerning whether neurosurgical aspiration or excision should be used in patients with brain abscess. The reported quality of evidence was described as “low” in the abstract and Table 1 and should instead be “moderate” as stated in the main text. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
