: Aim of the present study was to conduct a comprehensive review of surgical strategies that can be offered to patients with trigeminal neuralgia undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery and without intraoperative evidence of neurovascular conflict, with a high pre-operative suspicion of conflict lacking intraoperative confirmation, or individuals experiencing recurrence after previous treatment. This systematic review followed established guidelines (PRISMA) to identify and critically appraise relevant studies. The review question was formulated according to the PICO (P: patients; I: intervention; C: comparison; O: outcomes) framework as follows. For patients with trigeminal neuralgia (P) undergoing MVD surgery (I) without demonstrable preoperative neurovascular conflict, high suspicion of conflict but no intraoperative confirmation or recurrence after previous treatment (C), do additional surgical techniques (nerve combing, neurapraxia, arachnoid lysis) (O) improve pain relief outcomes (O)? The search of the literature yielded a total of 221 results. Duplicate records were then removed (n = [76]). A total of 143 papers was screened, and 117 records were excluded via title and abstract screening; 26 studies were found to be relevant to our research question and were assessed for eligibility. Upon full-text review, 17 articles were included in the review, describing the following techniques; (1) internal neurolysis (n = 6) (2) arachnoid lysis/adhesiolysis (n = 2) (3) neurapraxia (n = 3) (4) partial rhizotomy of the sensory root (n = 4) (5) pontine descending tractotomy (n = 2). The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions) assessment tool. While the described techniques hold promise, further research is warranted to establish standardized protocols, refine surgical approaches, and comprehensively evaluate long-term outcomes.
Montano, N., Menna, G., Musarra, A., Martinelli, R., Izzo, A., D'Alessandris, Q. G., D'Ercole, M., Olivi, A., A systematic review on the efficacy of adjunctive surgical strategies during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia without intraoperative evidence of neurovascular conflict, <<NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW>>, 2024; 47 (1): 276-276. [doi:10.1007/s10143-024-02498-7] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/289636]
A systematic review on the efficacy of adjunctive surgical strategies during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia without intraoperative evidence of neurovascular conflict
Montano, Nicola;Menna, Grazia;Musarra, Alessandra;Martinelli, Renata;D'Alessandris, Quintino Giorgio;D'Ercole, Manuela;Olivi, Alessandro
2024
Abstract
: Aim of the present study was to conduct a comprehensive review of surgical strategies that can be offered to patients with trigeminal neuralgia undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery and without intraoperative evidence of neurovascular conflict, with a high pre-operative suspicion of conflict lacking intraoperative confirmation, or individuals experiencing recurrence after previous treatment. This systematic review followed established guidelines (PRISMA) to identify and critically appraise relevant studies. The review question was formulated according to the PICO (P: patients; I: intervention; C: comparison; O: outcomes) framework as follows. For patients with trigeminal neuralgia (P) undergoing MVD surgery (I) without demonstrable preoperative neurovascular conflict, high suspicion of conflict but no intraoperative confirmation or recurrence after previous treatment (C), do additional surgical techniques (nerve combing, neurapraxia, arachnoid lysis) (O) improve pain relief outcomes (O)? The search of the literature yielded a total of 221 results. Duplicate records were then removed (n = [76]). A total of 143 papers was screened, and 117 records were excluded via title and abstract screening; 26 studies were found to be relevant to our research question and were assessed for eligibility. Upon full-text review, 17 articles were included in the review, describing the following techniques; (1) internal neurolysis (n = 6) (2) arachnoid lysis/adhesiolysis (n = 2) (3) neurapraxia (n = 3) (4) partial rhizotomy of the sensory root (n = 4) (5) pontine descending tractotomy (n = 2). The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions) assessment tool. While the described techniques hold promise, further research is warranted to establish standardized protocols, refine surgical approaches, and comprehensively evaluate long-term outcomes.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.