Progression of the ascending aorta diameter after surgical or transcatheter bicuspid aortic valve replacement

Objectives: Ascending aorta dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve is related both to genetic and haemodynamic factors. Aim of this study is to compare late progression of ascending aorta dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) vs transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods: Data of 189 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis were prospectively collected. Patients who underwent SAVR were compared to patients who underwent TAVI. Indication to the procedure was validated by the institutional Heart Team. Aortic diameters were evaluated by transthoracic echocardiogram. Differences between preoperative and long-term follow-up ascending aorta diameters were compared in the two groups. Results: Between January 2015 and December 2021, 143(76%) patients underwent SAVR and 46(24%) patients underwent TAVI. At 4.6 (Standard Deviation, SD 1.7) years follow-up, patients in the TAVI group showed significantly lower survival (P = 0.00013) and event-free survival (P < 0.0001). Ascending aorta diameter progression was lower in surgical compared to transcatheter patients, 0.95(0.60,1.30) mm vs 1.65(0.67, 2.63) mm, P = 0.02. Ascending aorta diameter progression indexed for body surface area and height, was lower in the surgical group: 0.72(0.38,1.05) mm/m2 vs 1.05(0.39,1.71) mm/m2 P = 0.02, and 0.59(0.36,0.81) mm/m vs 1.11(0.44,1.78) mm/m, P = 0.001, respectively. At multivariable linear regression analysis transcatheter procedure, baseline aortic diameter, and paravalvular leak were significantly associated with increased postoperative ascending aorta dilatation. Conclusions: Bicuspid aortic valve patients who underwent SAVR, showed significantly less long-term ascending aorta diameter progression than patients who underwent transcatheter procedure.