The question on the question that Sini brought in philosophy aims to shake up the very foundations of the West’s rational thinking, that is, theory. A similar recursiveness is clearly visible, for example, in the method of cultural anthropology, linguistics and history. The paradoxical outcome does not invite a flat relativism; rather, it is an opportunity to exercise a new ethics of knowledge and a new figure of the subject: to force Remotti’s term, it is an anthropopoietic exercise. The truth of the world is configured in the threshold of meaning opened by its own practices: it exposes itself, thus, to its own error and catastrophe.
Beltramo, G. L., La ricorsività della teoria. Per un'etica dell'errore, <<JUS>>, 2023; IX (5): 108-138. [doi:10.26350/18277942_000146] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/278338]
La ricorsività della teoria. Per un'etica dell'errore
Beltramo, Giorgio Lorenzo
2023
Abstract
The question on the question that Sini brought in philosophy aims to shake up the very foundations of the West’s rational thinking, that is, theory. A similar recursiveness is clearly visible, for example, in the method of cultural anthropology, linguistics and history. The paradoxical outcome does not invite a flat relativism; rather, it is an opportunity to exercise a new ethics of knowledge and a new figure of the subject: to force Remotti’s term, it is an anthropopoietic exercise. The truth of the world is configured in the threshold of meaning opened by its own practices: it exposes itself, thus, to its own error and catastrophe.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.