Background: Palpatory findings are considered a central element of osteopathic practice, especially when associated with a patient’s altered regulative functions than with named somatic dysfunctions. Although osteopathic theories for somatic dysfunction could be plausible, the clinical applicability of the concept is debated, especially because it is largely related to simple cause–effect models of osteopathic care. In contrast to a linear kind of diagnosis of a “tissue as a producer of symptoms”, this perspective article aims to provide a conceptual and operational framework in which the somatic dysfunction evaluation process is seen as a neuroaesthetic (en)active encounter between osteopath and patient. Subsections relevant to the subject: To summarize all concepts of the hypothesis, the enactive neuroaesthetics principles are proposed as a critical foundation for the osteopathic assessment and treatment of the person, specifically addressing a new paradigm for somatic dysfunction. Conclusions, and future directions: The present perspective article represents a proposition to blend technical rationality informed by neurocognitive and social sciences, and professional artistry clinical experience informed by traditional tenets, to overcome the controversy around somatic dysfunction, rather than dismissing the concept.
Consorti, G., Castagna, C., Tramontano, M., Longobardi, M., Castagna, P., Di Lernia, D., Lunghi, C., Reconceptualizing Somatic Dysfunction in the Light of a Neuroaesthetic Enactive Paradigm, <<HEALTHCARE>>, N/A; 11 (4): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.3390/healthcare11040479] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/272880]
Reconceptualizing Somatic Dysfunction in the Light of a Neuroaesthetic Enactive Paradigm
Castagna, Carlo;Longobardi, Martina;Di Lernia, Daniele;Lunghi, Carla
2023
Abstract
Background: Palpatory findings are considered a central element of osteopathic practice, especially when associated with a patient’s altered regulative functions than with named somatic dysfunctions. Although osteopathic theories for somatic dysfunction could be plausible, the clinical applicability of the concept is debated, especially because it is largely related to simple cause–effect models of osteopathic care. In contrast to a linear kind of diagnosis of a “tissue as a producer of symptoms”, this perspective article aims to provide a conceptual and operational framework in which the somatic dysfunction evaluation process is seen as a neuroaesthetic (en)active encounter between osteopath and patient. Subsections relevant to the subject: To summarize all concepts of the hypothesis, the enactive neuroaesthetics principles are proposed as a critical foundation for the osteopathic assessment and treatment of the person, specifically addressing a new paradigm for somatic dysfunction. Conclusions, and future directions: The present perspective article represents a proposition to blend technical rationality informed by neurocognitive and social sciences, and professional artistry clinical experience informed by traditional tenets, to overcome the controversy around somatic dysfunction, rather than dismissing the concept.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
healthcare-11-00479-v2.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia file ?:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
3.37 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.37 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.