Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in Europe and its management involves a variety of health professionals. In recent years, big discoveries were made concerning the management of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer, particularly in the field of molecular biology and minimally invasive surgery. This requires the continuous updating of guidelines and protocols over the years. In this paper, we aim to summarize and compare common points and disparities among protocols for management of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer by leading international gynecological oncological societies. We therefore systematically report the parallel among the guidelines based on the various steps patients with endometrial cancer usually undergo. The comparison between American and European protocols revealed some relevant disparities, in particular regarding surgical staging, molecular biology application as a prognostic tool and follow up regimens. This could possibly cause differences in interpreting and applying protocols in clinical practice in small centers, leading to a lack of adherence to guidelines or even prompting a confusing mix of them.

Restaino, S., Paglietti, C., Arcieri, M., Biasioli, A., Della Martina, M., Mariuzzi, L., Andreetta, C., Titone, F., Bogani, G., Raimondo, D., Perelli, F., Buda, A., Petrillo, M., Greco, P., Ercoli, A., Fanfani, F., Scambia, G., Driul, L., Vizzielli, G., Management of Patients Diagnosed with Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Guidelines, <<CANCERS>>, 2023; 15 (4): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.3390/cancers15041091] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/272653]

Management of Patients Diagnosed with Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Guidelines

Fanfani, Francesco;Scambia, Giovanni;
2023

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in Europe and its management involves a variety of health professionals. In recent years, big discoveries were made concerning the management of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer, particularly in the field of molecular biology and minimally invasive surgery. This requires the continuous updating of guidelines and protocols over the years. In this paper, we aim to summarize and compare common points and disparities among protocols for management of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer by leading international gynecological oncological societies. We therefore systematically report the parallel among the guidelines based on the various steps patients with endometrial cancer usually undergo. The comparison between American and European protocols revealed some relevant disparities, in particular regarding surgical staging, molecular biology application as a prognostic tool and follow up regimens. This could possibly cause differences in interpreting and applying protocols in clinical practice in small centers, leading to a lack of adherence to guidelines or even prompting a confusing mix of them.
2023
Inglese
Restaino, S., Paglietti, C., Arcieri, M., Biasioli, A., Della Martina, M., Mariuzzi, L., Andreetta, C., Titone, F., Bogani, G., Raimondo, D., Perelli, F., Buda, A., Petrillo, M., Greco, P., Ercoli, A., Fanfani, F., Scambia, G., Driul, L., Vizzielli, G., Management of Patients Diagnosed with Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Guidelines, <<CANCERS>>, 2023; 15 (4): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.3390/cancers15041091] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/272653]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
cancers-15-01091.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 321.26 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
321.26 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/272653
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact