BackgroundIn Italy, the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection peaked in April and November 2020, defining two pandemic waves of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study compared the characteristics and outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and SARS-CoV-2 infections between pandemic waves.MethodsObservational longitudinal study of IBD patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with established diagnoses of IBD and of SARS-CoV-2 infection were consecutively enrolled in two periods: (i) first wave, from 1 March 2020 to 31 May 2020; and (ii) second wave, from 15 September to 15 December 2020.ResultsWe enrolled 937 IBD patients (219 in the first wave, 718 in the second wave). Patients of the first wave were older (mean & PLUSMN; SD: 46.3 & PLUSMN; 16.2 vs. 44.1 & PLUSMN; 15.4 years, p = 0.06), more likely to have ulcerative colitis (58.0% vs. 44.4%, p < 0.001) and comorbidities (48.9% vs. 38.9%; p < 0.01), and more frequently residing in Northern Italy (73.1% vs. 46.0%, p < 0.001) than patients of the second wave. There were no significant differences between pandemic waves in sex (male: 54.3% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.82) or frequency of active IBD (44.3% vs. 39.0%, p = 0.18). The rates of negative outcomes were significantly higher in the first than second wave: pneumonia (27.8% vs. 11.7%, p < 0.001), hospital admission (27.4% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001), ventilatory support (11.9% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.003) and death (5.5% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.007).ConclusionBetween the first and second SARS-CoV-2 pandemic waves, demographic, clinical and geographical features of IBD patients were different as were the symptoms and outcomes of infection. These differences are likely due to the different epidemiological situations and diagnostic possibilities between the two waves.
Bezzio, C., Vernero, M., Costa, S., Armuzzi, A., Fiorino, G., Ardizzone, S., Roselli, J., Carparelli, S., Orlando, A., Caprioli, F. A., Castiglione, F., Viganò, C., Ribaldone, D. G., Zingone, F., Monterubbianesi, R., Imperatore, N., Festa, S., Daperno, M., Scucchi, L., Ferronato, A., Pastorelli, L., Alimenti, E., Balestrieri, P., Ricci, C., Cappello, M., Felice, C., Coppini, F., Alvisi, P., Di Luna, I., Gerardi, V., Variola, A., Mazzuoli, S., Lenti, M. V., Saibeni, S., Pugliese, D., Furfaro, F., Maconi, G., Milla, M., Bossa, F., Giuliano, A., Piazza, N., Manes, G., Sartini, A., Buda, A., Micheli, F., Ciardo, V., Casella, G., Viscido, A., Bodini, G., Casini, V., Soriano, A., Amato, A., Grossi, L., Onali, S., Rottoli, M., Spagnuolo, R., Baroni, S., Cortelezzi, C., Baldoni, M., Vernero, M., Scaldaferri, F., Maconi, G., Guarino, A., Palermo, A., D’Incà, R., Scribano, M. L., Biancone, L., Carrozza, L., Ascolani, M., Costa, F., Di Sabatino, A., Zammarchi, I., Gottin, M., Conforti, F. S., Null, N., SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: comparison between the first and second pandemic waves, <<BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY>>, 2023; 23 (1): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.1186/s12876-023-02841-0] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/268428]
SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: comparison between the first and second pandemic waves
Armuzzi, Alessandro;Festa, Stefano;Felice, Carla;Pugliese, Daniela;Casella, Giovanni;Spagnuolo, Rocco;Scaldaferri, Franco;
2023
Abstract
BackgroundIn Italy, the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection peaked in April and November 2020, defining two pandemic waves of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study compared the characteristics and outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and SARS-CoV-2 infections between pandemic waves.MethodsObservational longitudinal study of IBD patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with established diagnoses of IBD and of SARS-CoV-2 infection were consecutively enrolled in two periods: (i) first wave, from 1 March 2020 to 31 May 2020; and (ii) second wave, from 15 September to 15 December 2020.ResultsWe enrolled 937 IBD patients (219 in the first wave, 718 in the second wave). Patients of the first wave were older (mean & PLUSMN; SD: 46.3 & PLUSMN; 16.2 vs. 44.1 & PLUSMN; 15.4 years, p = 0.06), more likely to have ulcerative colitis (58.0% vs. 44.4%, p < 0.001) and comorbidities (48.9% vs. 38.9%; p < 0.01), and more frequently residing in Northern Italy (73.1% vs. 46.0%, p < 0.001) than patients of the second wave. There were no significant differences between pandemic waves in sex (male: 54.3% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.82) or frequency of active IBD (44.3% vs. 39.0%, p = 0.18). The rates of negative outcomes were significantly higher in the first than second wave: pneumonia (27.8% vs. 11.7%, p < 0.001), hospital admission (27.4% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001), ventilatory support (11.9% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.003) and death (5.5% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.007).ConclusionBetween the first and second SARS-CoV-2 pandemic waves, demographic, clinical and geographical features of IBD patients were different as were the symptoms and outcomes of infection. These differences are likely due to the different epidemiological situations and diagnostic possibilities between the two waves.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
s12876-023-02841-0.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia file ?:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
868.61 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
868.61 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
