Background: The classification of macular hole closure patterns (MHCPs) currently relies on time domain OCT allowing only “open” and “closed” statuses or is based on inner foveal contour shape. Both classification types give no information on retinal layer reconstitution. Novel sophisticated surgical techniques lead to previously unknown MHCPs, outdating existing classifications and urging new ones. The purpose of the present study is to introduce a new classification allowing proper description of all MHCPs resulting from newer surgeries and based on the restoration of retinal layers. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing MH surgery with five different surgical techniques was performed. MHCPs were classified according to spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Type 0: open MH (0A: flat margin, 0B: elevated, 0C: oedematous); type 1: closed MHs (1A: reconstitution all retinal layers; 1B interruption of the external layers; 1C interruption of internal layers); type 2: MH closed with autologous or heterologous filling tissue interrupting the normal foveal layered anatomy (2A: filling tissue through all layers; 2B reconstitution of normal inner retinal layers; 2C reconstitution of normal outer retinal layers; 2D H-shaped bridging of filling tissue). Results: Closure rate was 95.2% (241/253). Surgical technique and vision correlated to closure pattern (p < 0.001). Type 1 MHCPs had the best post-operative visual acuity (VA) compared with type 2 and type 0 (p < 0.001). MHCPs 1A and 1C performed better than all others. MHCP at months 1 and 3 changed in 42/254 (16.5%) and remained stable in 212/254 (83.5%). Improvement in vision was higher in eyes with shifting closure pattern (0.57 ± 0.33 vs 0.51 ± 0.48 logMAR; p 0.021). Conclusion: MHCP classification based on retinal layer restoration properly comprises post-operative anatomic morphologies. MHCPs correlate the surgical technique and post-operative visual outcomes. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Rossi, T., Bacherini, D., Caporossi, T., Telani, S., Iannetta, D., Rizzo, S., Moysidis, S. N., Koulisis, N., Mahmoud, T. H., Ripandelli, G., Macular hole closure patterns: an updated classification, <<GRAEFE'S ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY>>, 2020; 258 (12): 2629-2638. [doi:10.1007/s00417-020-04920-4] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/247600]

Macular hole closure patterns: an updated classification

Rossi, Tommaso;Bacherini, Daniela;Caporossi, Tomaso;Rizzo, Stanislao;
2020

Abstract

Background: The classification of macular hole closure patterns (MHCPs) currently relies on time domain OCT allowing only “open” and “closed” statuses or is based on inner foveal contour shape. Both classification types give no information on retinal layer reconstitution. Novel sophisticated surgical techniques lead to previously unknown MHCPs, outdating existing classifications and urging new ones. The purpose of the present study is to introduce a new classification allowing proper description of all MHCPs resulting from newer surgeries and based on the restoration of retinal layers. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing MH surgery with five different surgical techniques was performed. MHCPs were classified according to spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Type 0: open MH (0A: flat margin, 0B: elevated, 0C: oedematous); type 1: closed MHs (1A: reconstitution all retinal layers; 1B interruption of the external layers; 1C interruption of internal layers); type 2: MH closed with autologous or heterologous filling tissue interrupting the normal foveal layered anatomy (2A: filling tissue through all layers; 2B reconstitution of normal inner retinal layers; 2C reconstitution of normal outer retinal layers; 2D H-shaped bridging of filling tissue). Results: Closure rate was 95.2% (241/253). Surgical technique and vision correlated to closure pattern (p < 0.001). Type 1 MHCPs had the best post-operative visual acuity (VA) compared with type 2 and type 0 (p < 0.001). MHCPs 1A and 1C performed better than all others. MHCP at months 1 and 3 changed in 42/254 (16.5%) and remained stable in 212/254 (83.5%). Improvement in vision was higher in eyes with shifting closure pattern (0.57 ± 0.33 vs 0.51 ± 0.48 logMAR; p 0.021). Conclusion: MHCP classification based on retinal layer restoration properly comprises post-operative anatomic morphologies. MHCPs correlate the surgical technique and post-operative visual outcomes. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
2020
Inglese
Rossi, T., Bacherini, D., Caporossi, T., Telani, S., Iannetta, D., Rizzo, S., Moysidis, S. N., Koulisis, N., Mahmoud, T. H., Ripandelli, G., Macular hole closure patterns: an updated classification, <<GRAEFE'S ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY>>, 2020; 258 (12): 2629-2638. [doi:10.1007/s00417-020-04920-4] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/247600]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/247600
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact