Politicians can use counterfactual communication to promote their own representations of past political events, to defend themselves, to attack their adversaries, and, more generally, to influence citizens’ representation of political reality and of politicians. In this chapter, we focus on two main questions: a) What counterfactuals do politicians use in discourse? b) What effects do these counterfactuals have on voters? In addressing these questions, we build on what previous psychological research has shown regarding counterfactual thinking and its relations with other psychological processes, such as causal reasoning, emotional reactions, and decision making.
Catellani, P., Counterfactuals in the social context: The case of political interviews and their effects, in Birke Dorothe, B. D., Butter Michae, B. M., Koeppe Tilman, K. T. (ed.), Counterfactual thinking-Counterfactual writing, De Gruyter, Berlin Boston 2011: 81- 94 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/2349]
Counterfactuals in the social context: The case of political interviews and their effects
Catellani, Patrizia
2011
Abstract
Politicians can use counterfactual communication to promote their own representations of past political events, to defend themselves, to attack their adversaries, and, more generally, to influence citizens’ representation of political reality and of politicians. In this chapter, we focus on two main questions: a) What counterfactuals do politicians use in discourse? b) What effects do these counterfactuals have on voters? In addressing these questions, we build on what previous psychological research has shown regarding counterfactual thinking and its relations with other psychological processes, such as causal reasoning, emotional reactions, and decision making.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.