Background: The aim of this study was to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced ERAS program application in colorectal surgery across hospitals in the Lazio region (central district in Italy) participating in the “Lazio Network” project. Methods: A multi-institutional database was constructed. All patients included in this study underwent elective colorectal surgery for both malignant and benign disease between January 2019 and December 2020. Emergency procedures were excluded. The population was divided into 2 groups: a pre-COVID-19 group (PG) of patients operated on between February and December 2019 and a COVID-19 group (CG) of patients operated on between February and December 2020, during the first 2 waves of the pandemic in Italy. Results: The groups included 622 patients in the PG and 615 in the CG treated in 8 hospitals of the network. The mean number of items applied was higher in the PG (65.6% vs. 56.6%, p < 0.001) in terms of preoperative items (64.2% vs. 50.7%, p < 0.001), intraoperative items (65.0% vs. 53.3%, p < 0.001), and postoperative items (68.8% vs. 63.2%, p < 0.001). Postoperative recovery was faster in the PG, with a shorter time to first flatus, first stool, autonomous mobilization and discharge (6.82 days vs. 7.43 days, p = 0.021). Postoperative complications, mortality and reoperations were similar among the groups. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on the application of ERAS in the centers of the “Lazio Network” study group, with a reduction in adherence to the ERAS protocol in terms of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative items. In addition, in the CG, the patients had worse postoperative outcomes with respect to recovery and discharge.
Grieco, M., Galiffa, G., Marcellinaro, R., Santoro, E., Persiani, R., Mancini, S., Di Paola, M., Santoro, R., Stipa, F., Crucitti, A., Carlini, M., Spoletini, D., Russo, G., Menditto, R., Palla, F., Giorgetti, G. M., Pernazza, G., Marino, P., De Luca, L., Mancini, R., Pende, V., Lirici, M., Falbo, F., D'Ugo, D., Sollazzi, L., Mele, M. C., Lorenzon, L., Gasbarrini, A., Pezzuto, R., Rinninella, E., Cintoni, M., Adducci, E., Belardi, A., Bonasera, E., Cappelloni, D., Angeloni, R., Minieri, L., Sagnotta, A., Folliero, G., Solinas, L., Arturi, A., Ferraris, C., Capuano, G., Romeo, G., Amodio, P. M., Carnevale, S., Sansonetti, A., Tierno, S. M., Mazzari, M. A., Diamanti, P., Muccichini, L., Menghetti, D., Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Application and Outcomes: Analysis in the “Lazio Network” Database, <<WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY>>, 2022; 46 (10): 2288-2296. [doi:10.1007/s00268-022-06694-8] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/232017]
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Application and Outcomes: Analysis in the “Lazio Network” Database
Grieco, Michele;Persiani, Roberto;Mancini, Stefano;Santoro, Roberto;Crucitti, Antonio;Russo, Giulia;D'Ugo, Domenico;Sollazzi, Liliana;Mele, Maria Cristina;Lorenzon, Laura;Gasbarrini, Antonio;Pezzuto, Roberto;Rinninella, Emanuele;Cintoni, Marco;Adducci, Enrica;Bonasera, Elena;Angeloni, Riccardo;Mazzari, Mario Attilio;
2022
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced ERAS program application in colorectal surgery across hospitals in the Lazio region (central district in Italy) participating in the “Lazio Network” project. Methods: A multi-institutional database was constructed. All patients included in this study underwent elective colorectal surgery for both malignant and benign disease between January 2019 and December 2020. Emergency procedures were excluded. The population was divided into 2 groups: a pre-COVID-19 group (PG) of patients operated on between February and December 2019 and a COVID-19 group (CG) of patients operated on between February and December 2020, during the first 2 waves of the pandemic in Italy. Results: The groups included 622 patients in the PG and 615 in the CG treated in 8 hospitals of the network. The mean number of items applied was higher in the PG (65.6% vs. 56.6%, p < 0.001) in terms of preoperative items (64.2% vs. 50.7%, p < 0.001), intraoperative items (65.0% vs. 53.3%, p < 0.001), and postoperative items (68.8% vs. 63.2%, p < 0.001). Postoperative recovery was faster in the PG, with a shorter time to first flatus, first stool, autonomous mobilization and discharge (6.82 days vs. 7.43 days, p = 0.021). Postoperative complications, mortality and reoperations were similar among the groups. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on the application of ERAS in the centers of the “Lazio Network” study group, with a reduction in adherence to the ERAS protocol in terms of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative items. In addition, in the CG, the patients had worse postoperative outcomes with respect to recovery and discharge.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
