Background: Bile duct injury (BDI) following cholecystectomy is associated with malpractice litigation. Aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for litigation in patients with BDI referred in a tertiary care center. Methods: Patients treated for BDI between 1994 and 2016. Stabilized inverse probability therapy weighting was used and multivariable logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for malpractice litigation. Results: Of the 211 treated patients, 98 met the inclusion criteria: early-referral group (<20 days; 51.0%), late-referral (≥20 days; 49.0%). 36 patients (36.7%) initiated malpractice litigation with verdict in favor of plaintiff in 86.7% of cases (median payment = €90 500, up to €600 000). Attempts at surgical and endoscopic repair before referral were significantly higher in late-referral group. Failed postoperative management (delayed referral, attempts at repair before referral) was one of the strongest predictors for litigation. Risk of litigation progressively increased from 23.8%, when referral time was within 19 days, to 54.5% (61-120 days), to 60.0% (121-210 days) and to 65.1% (211-365 days). Discussion: Litigation rate after BDI was 37%. Delayed referral to tertiary care center was one of the strongest predictors for litigation. Prompt referral to tertiary experienced centers without any attempt at repair may reduce the risk of litigation.

Ardito, F., Lai, Q., Savelli, A., Grassi, S., Panettieri, E., Clemente, G., Nuzzo, G., Oliva, A., Giuliante, F., Bile duct injury following cholecystectomy: delayed referral to a tertiary care center is strongly associated with malpractice litigation, <<HPB>>, 2023; 25 (3): 374-383. [doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2023.01.005] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/228612]

Bile duct injury following cholecystectomy: delayed referral to a tertiary care center is strongly associated with malpractice litigation

Ardito, Francesco;Grassi, Simone;Panettieri, Elena;Clemente, Gennaro;Nuzzo, Gennaro;Oliva, Antonio;Giuliante, Felice
2023

Abstract

Background: Bile duct injury (BDI) following cholecystectomy is associated with malpractice litigation. Aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for litigation in patients with BDI referred in a tertiary care center. Methods: Patients treated for BDI between 1994 and 2016. Stabilized inverse probability therapy weighting was used and multivariable logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for malpractice litigation. Results: Of the 211 treated patients, 98 met the inclusion criteria: early-referral group (<20 days; 51.0%), late-referral (≥20 days; 49.0%). 36 patients (36.7%) initiated malpractice litigation with verdict in favor of plaintiff in 86.7% of cases (median payment = €90 500, up to €600 000). Attempts at surgical and endoscopic repair before referral were significantly higher in late-referral group. Failed postoperative management (delayed referral, attempts at repair before referral) was one of the strongest predictors for litigation. Risk of litigation progressively increased from 23.8%, when referral time was within 19 days, to 54.5% (61-120 days), to 60.0% (121-210 days) and to 65.1% (211-365 days). Discussion: Litigation rate after BDI was 37%. Delayed referral to tertiary care center was one of the strongest predictors for litigation. Prompt referral to tertiary experienced centers without any attempt at repair may reduce the risk of litigation.
2023
Inglese
HPB
Ardito, F., Lai, Q., Savelli, A., Grassi, S., Panettieri, E., Clemente, G., Nuzzo, G., Oliva, A., Giuliante, F., Bile duct injury following cholecystectomy: delayed referral to a tertiary care center is strongly associated with malpractice litigation, <<HPB>>, 2023; 25 (3): 374-383. [doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2023.01.005] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/228612]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/228612
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact