Purpose. We studied occupational stress and its psychosocial effects in a sample of Italian radiologists and radiotherapists. Materials and methods. Radiologists and radiotherapists attending two medical conferences were invited to complete a questionnaire comprising four sections investigating the risk of occupational stress (organisational discomfort, Karasek's Job Content Questionnaire, Siegrist's Effort-Reward Imbalance, Warr's Job Satisfaction) and four sections investigating the health effects of such stress (Goldberg's Anxiety and Depression scales, General Health Questionnaire, Lifestyles Questionnaire). Results. Radiologists and radiotherapists generally expressed high levels of control, reward and satisfaction. However, 38.5% complained of severe organisational discomfort, 24% reported job strain, 28% reported effort/reward imbalance and 25% were dissatisfied. Female radiologists and radiotherapists showed higher levels of organisational discomfort than their male colleagues. Younger and less experienced radiologists and radiotherapists had higher strain scores than their older and more experienced colleagues. A significant correlation was observed between stress predictors and the effects of stress on health, including depression and anxiety, psychological distress and unhealthy lifestyles. Conclusions. Radiologists and radiotherapists are exposed to major occupational stress factors, and a significant percentage of them suffer from workplace stress. A special effort is required to prevent this condition. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.

Magnavita, N., Fileni, A., Magnavita, G., Mammi, F., Mirk, P., Roccia, K., Bergamaschi, A., Work stress in radiologists. A pilot study, <<LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA>>, 2008; 113 (3): 329-346. [doi:10.1007/s11547-008-0259-4] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/226933]

Work stress in radiologists. A pilot study

Magnavita, Nicola
Primo
Conceptualization
;
2008

Abstract

Purpose. We studied occupational stress and its psychosocial effects in a sample of Italian radiologists and radiotherapists. Materials and methods. Radiologists and radiotherapists attending two medical conferences were invited to complete a questionnaire comprising four sections investigating the risk of occupational stress (organisational discomfort, Karasek's Job Content Questionnaire, Siegrist's Effort-Reward Imbalance, Warr's Job Satisfaction) and four sections investigating the health effects of such stress (Goldberg's Anxiety and Depression scales, General Health Questionnaire, Lifestyles Questionnaire). Results. Radiologists and radiotherapists generally expressed high levels of control, reward and satisfaction. However, 38.5% complained of severe organisational discomfort, 24% reported job strain, 28% reported effort/reward imbalance and 25% were dissatisfied. Female radiologists and radiotherapists showed higher levels of organisational discomfort than their male colleagues. Younger and less experienced radiologists and radiotherapists had higher strain scores than their older and more experienced colleagues. A significant correlation was observed between stress predictors and the effects of stress on health, including depression and anxiety, psychological distress and unhealthy lifestyles. Conclusions. Radiologists and radiotherapists are exposed to major occupational stress factors, and a significant percentage of them suffer from workplace stress. A special effort is required to prevent this condition. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.
2008
Inglese
Magnavita, N., Fileni, A., Magnavita, G., Mammi, F., Mirk, P., Roccia, K., Bergamaschi, A., Work stress in radiologists. A pilot study, <<LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA>>, 2008; 113 (3): 329-346. [doi:10.1007/s11547-008-0259-4] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/226933]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/226933
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 16
  • Scopus 46
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 46
social impact