Previous survival studies suggested a better prognosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) patients compared with the sporadic counterpart. In the present study we evaluated the clinical outcome of HNPCC patients with respect to that of patients with colorectal cancer re corded in a population-based cancer registry. We assessed survival of 85 colorectal cancer patients from 24 unrelated families defined as having HNPCC according to the criteria of the international Collaborative Group, for whom adequate information on subject- and tumor-related parameters and a 5-year follow-up (cancer diagnosis from 1980-1989) were available. Three hundred and seventy-seven colorectal cancer patients, registered from 1984-1986, with a 5-year followup, were used for comparison. Colorectal cancer-specific 5-year survival rates were 55.2% and 42.5% for HNPCC and non HNPCC, respectively. Using Cox regression analysis, tumor staging and location were independently associated with survival, whereas HNPCC diagnosis was not. Stage II HNPCC cases exhibited a better prognosis than non-HNPCC patients. By Cox regression analysis, none of the variables were significantly related to survival. Both overall and stage II HNPCC cases showed a survival advantage in comparison with non-HNPCC patients. However, the difference disappeared when clinical and pathological variables were controlled for with a Cox regression analysis. (C) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Percesepe, A., Benatti, P., Roncucci, L., Sassatelli, R., Fante, R., Ganazzi, D., Bellacosa, A., Genuardi, M., Neri, G., Viel, A., Deleon, M., Survival analysis in families affected by hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, <<INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER>>, 1997; 71 (3): 373-376. [doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970502)71:3<373::AID-IJC12>3.0.CO;2-H] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/219917]

Survival analysis in families affected by hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

Genuardi, Maurizio;
1997

Abstract

Previous survival studies suggested a better prognosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) patients compared with the sporadic counterpart. In the present study we evaluated the clinical outcome of HNPCC patients with respect to that of patients with colorectal cancer re corded in a population-based cancer registry. We assessed survival of 85 colorectal cancer patients from 24 unrelated families defined as having HNPCC according to the criteria of the international Collaborative Group, for whom adequate information on subject- and tumor-related parameters and a 5-year follow-up (cancer diagnosis from 1980-1989) were available. Three hundred and seventy-seven colorectal cancer patients, registered from 1984-1986, with a 5-year followup, were used for comparison. Colorectal cancer-specific 5-year survival rates were 55.2% and 42.5% for HNPCC and non HNPCC, respectively. Using Cox regression analysis, tumor staging and location were independently associated with survival, whereas HNPCC diagnosis was not. Stage II HNPCC cases exhibited a better prognosis than non-HNPCC patients. By Cox regression analysis, none of the variables were significantly related to survival. Both overall and stage II HNPCC cases showed a survival advantage in comparison with non-HNPCC patients. However, the difference disappeared when clinical and pathological variables were controlled for with a Cox regression analysis. (C) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
1997
Inglese
Percesepe, A., Benatti, P., Roncucci, L., Sassatelli, R., Fante, R., Ganazzi, D., Bellacosa, A., Genuardi, M., Neri, G., Viel, A., Deleon, M., Survival analysis in families affected by hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, <<INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER>>, 1997; 71 (3): 373-376. [doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970502)71:3<373::AID-IJC12>3.0.CO;2-H] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/219917]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/219917
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
social impact