Objective: The aim of this scoping review is to map the available evidence about the use of health technology assessment (HTA) in the assessment of whole genome sequencing (WGS).Methods: A scoping review methodology was adopted. The population, concept, and context framework was used to build up the research question and to establish the eligibility criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews was adopted to implement a comprehensive search strategy. Evidence was retrieved from scientific databases and HTA organizations Web sites. Reports were classified as full HTA, mini-HTA, rapid reviews or other.Results: The search strategy identified seven reports. Five HTA organizations from five countries elaborated the reports: one full HTA, four rapid reviews, and two classified as others. The reports were mainly focused on the evaluation of the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of genome-wide sequencing as well as informing policy questions by providing analyses of organizational and ethical considerations.Conclusions: Few HTA organizations are drafting reports for WGS. It is essential to stimulate a critical reflection during the elaboration of HTA reports for WGS to steer choices of decision makers in the establishment of priorities for research and policy and reimbursement rates.

Nurchis, M. C., Riccardi, M. T., Damiani, G., Health technology assessment of whole genome sequencing in the diagnosis of genetic disorders: a scoping review of the literature, <<INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE>>, 2022; 38 (1): e71-N/A. [doi:10.1017/S0266462322000496] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/214914]

Health technology assessment of whole genome sequencing in the diagnosis of genetic disorders: a scoping review of the literature

Nurchis, Mario Cesare;Riccardi, Maria Teresa;Damiani, Gianfranco
2022

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this scoping review is to map the available evidence about the use of health technology assessment (HTA) in the assessment of whole genome sequencing (WGS).Methods: A scoping review methodology was adopted. The population, concept, and context framework was used to build up the research question and to establish the eligibility criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews was adopted to implement a comprehensive search strategy. Evidence was retrieved from scientific databases and HTA organizations Web sites. Reports were classified as full HTA, mini-HTA, rapid reviews or other.Results: The search strategy identified seven reports. Five HTA organizations from five countries elaborated the reports: one full HTA, four rapid reviews, and two classified as others. The reports were mainly focused on the evaluation of the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of genome-wide sequencing as well as informing policy questions by providing analyses of organizational and ethical considerations.Conclusions: Few HTA organizations are drafting reports for WGS. It is essential to stimulate a critical reflection during the elaboration of HTA reports for WGS to steer choices of decision makers in the establishment of priorities for research and policy and reimbursement rates.
2022
Inglese
Nurchis, M. C., Riccardi, M. T., Damiani, G., Health technology assessment of whole genome sequencing in the diagnosis of genetic disorders: a scoping review of the literature, <<INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE>>, 2022; 38 (1): e71-N/A. [doi:10.1017/S0266462322000496] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/214914]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2022 - Health technology assessment of whole genome.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 332.15 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
332.15 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/214914
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact