A limited ileocaecal resection is the most frequently performed procedure for ileocaecal CD and different anastomotic configurations and techniques have been described. This manuscript audited the different anastomotic techniques used in a national study and evaluated their influence on postoperative outcomes following ileocaecal resection for primary CD. This is a retrospective, multicentre, observational study promoted by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR), including all adults undergoing elective ileocaecal resection for primary CD from June 2018 May 2019. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days of surgery was the primary endpoint. Postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) and anastomotic leak rate were the secondary outcomes. 427 patients were included. The side to side anastomosis was the chosen configuration in 380 patients (89%). The stapled anastomotic (n = 286; 67%), techniques were preferred to hand-sewn (n = 141; 33%). Postoperative morbidity was 20.3% and anastomotic leak 3.7%. Anastomotic leak was independent of the type of anastomosis performed, while was associated with an ASA grade ≥ 3, presence of perianal disease and ileocolonic localization of disease. Four predictors of LOS were identified after multivariate analysis. The laparoscopic approach was the only associated with a reduced LOS (p = 0.017), while age, ASA grade ≥ 3 or administration of preoperative TPN were associated with increased LOS. The side to side was the most commonly used anastomotic configuration for ileocolic reconstruction following primary CD resection. There was no difference in postoperative morbidity according to anastomotic technique and configuration. Anastomotic leak was associated with ASA grade ≥ 3, a penetrating phenotype of disease and ileo-colonic distribution of CD.
Celentano, V., Pellino, G., Spinelli, A., Selvaggi, F., Celentano, V., Pellino, G., Selvaggi, L., Sciaudone, G., Selvaggi, F., Rottoli, M., Poggioli, G., Tanzanu, M., Sica, G., Campanelli, M., Giglio, M. C., Coco, C., Rizzo, G., Sionne, F., Colombo, F., Sampietro, G., Lamperti, G., Foschi, D., Ficari, F., Vacca, L., Cricchio, M., Giudici, F., Peltrini, R., Manfreda, A., Bucci, L., Galleano, R., Ghazouani, O., Zorcolo, L., Deidda, S., Restivo, A., Braini, A., Candido, F. D., Sacchi, M., Carvello, M., Martorana, S., Spinelli, A., Bordignon, G., Angriman, I., Variola, A., Ruscio, M. D., Barugola, G., Geccherle, A., Tropeano, F. P., Luglio, G., Sasia, D., Migliore, M., Giuffrida, M. C., Marrano, E., Moretto, G., Gallo, G., Vescio, G., Sammarco, G., Terrosu, G., Calini, G., Bondurri, A., Maffioli, A., Zaffaroni, G., Resegotti, A., Mistrangelo, M., Botti, F., Prati, M., Boni, L., Perotti, S., Mineccia, M., Giuliani, A., Romano, L., Graziano, G. M. P., Pugliese, L., Pietrabissa, A., Spinelli, A., Anastomosis configuration and technique following ileocaecal resection for Crohn’s disease: a multicentre study, <<UPDATES IN SURGERY>>, 2021; 73 (1): 149-156. [doi:10.1007/s13304-020-00918-z] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/180141]
Anastomosis configuration and technique following ileocaecal resection for Crohn’s disease: a multicentre study
Coco, C.;Rizzo, G.;Sionne, F.;Giuliani, A.;
2021
Abstract
A limited ileocaecal resection is the most frequently performed procedure for ileocaecal CD and different anastomotic configurations and techniques have been described. This manuscript audited the different anastomotic techniques used in a national study and evaluated their influence on postoperative outcomes following ileocaecal resection for primary CD. This is a retrospective, multicentre, observational study promoted by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR), including all adults undergoing elective ileocaecal resection for primary CD from June 2018 May 2019. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days of surgery was the primary endpoint. Postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) and anastomotic leak rate were the secondary outcomes. 427 patients were included. The side to side anastomosis was the chosen configuration in 380 patients (89%). The stapled anastomotic (n = 286; 67%), techniques were preferred to hand-sewn (n = 141; 33%). Postoperative morbidity was 20.3% and anastomotic leak 3.7%. Anastomotic leak was independent of the type of anastomosis performed, while was associated with an ASA grade ≥ 3, presence of perianal disease and ileocolonic localization of disease. Four predictors of LOS were identified after multivariate analysis. The laparoscopic approach was the only associated with a reduced LOS (p = 0.017), while age, ASA grade ≥ 3 or administration of preoperative TPN were associated with increased LOS. The side to side was the most commonly used anastomotic configuration for ileocolic reconstruction following primary CD resection. There was no difference in postoperative morbidity according to anastomotic technique and configuration. Anastomotic leak was associated with ASA grade ≥ 3, a penetrating phenotype of disease and ileo-colonic distribution of CD.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
