Purpose: Few comparative studies are available on the long-term prognostic role of mesopancreas (MP) excision after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We compared the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing standard PD (sPD) and PD with MP excision (PD-MPe). Methods: Sixty sPDs were compared to 60 matched PD-MPe patients for intraoperative and postoperative data, histopathological findings, and long-term outcomes. Results: R0 rate was similar in the two groups (p = 0.17). However, PD-MPe related to a lower rate of MP resection margin positivity (16.7% vs 5%; p = 0.04) and to a higher harvested lymph nodes number (19.8 ± 7.6 vs 10.1 ± 5.1; p < 0.0001). Local tumor recurrence was more frequent in the sPD cohort (55.5% vs 26.8% in the PD-MPe group; p = 0.002), with a consequent worse disease-free survival (DFS) (14.8% vs 22.3%; p = 0.04). An inferior 5-year overall survival (OS) was noted in case of MP margin positivity compared with MP margin negativity (0% vs 29%; p < 0.0001). MP positivity resulted as an independent prognostic factor for both a worse OS and DFS at the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: PD-MPe offers clinical advantages in terms of MP resection margin status, local recurrence, long-term mortality, and DFS. The lower MP positivity rate, achieved with PD-MPe, leads to better outcomes both in terms of OS and DFS.

Quero, G., Fiorillo, C., Menghi, R., Cina, C., Galiandro, F., Longo, F., Sofo, F., Rosa, F., Tortorelli, A. P., Giustiniani, M. C., Inzani, F., Alfieri, S., Total mesopancreas excision for periampullary malignancy: a single-center propensity score-matched comparison of long-term outcomes, <<LANGENBECK'S ARCHIVES OF SURGERY>>, 2020; 405 (3): 303-312. [doi:10.1007/s00423-020-01873-4] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/174678]

Total mesopancreas excision for periampullary malignancy: a single-center propensity score-matched comparison of long-term outcomes

Quero, Giuseppe;Fiorillo, Claudio;Menghi, Roberta;Rosa, Fausto;Tortorelli, Antonio Pio;Giustiniani, Maria Cristina;Inzani, Frediano;Alfieri, Sergio
2020

Abstract

Purpose: Few comparative studies are available on the long-term prognostic role of mesopancreas (MP) excision after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We compared the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing standard PD (sPD) and PD with MP excision (PD-MPe). Methods: Sixty sPDs were compared to 60 matched PD-MPe patients for intraoperative and postoperative data, histopathological findings, and long-term outcomes. Results: R0 rate was similar in the two groups (p = 0.17). However, PD-MPe related to a lower rate of MP resection margin positivity (16.7% vs 5%; p = 0.04) and to a higher harvested lymph nodes number (19.8 ± 7.6 vs 10.1 ± 5.1; p < 0.0001). Local tumor recurrence was more frequent in the sPD cohort (55.5% vs 26.8% in the PD-MPe group; p = 0.002), with a consequent worse disease-free survival (DFS) (14.8% vs 22.3%; p = 0.04). An inferior 5-year overall survival (OS) was noted in case of MP margin positivity compared with MP margin negativity (0% vs 29%; p < 0.0001). MP positivity resulted as an independent prognostic factor for both a worse OS and DFS at the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: PD-MPe offers clinical advantages in terms of MP resection margin status, local recurrence, long-term mortality, and DFS. The lower MP positivity rate, achieved with PD-MPe, leads to better outcomes both in terms of OS and DFS.
2020
Inglese
Quero, G., Fiorillo, C., Menghi, R., Cina, C., Galiandro, F., Longo, F., Sofo, F., Rosa, F., Tortorelli, A. P., Giustiniani, M. C., Inzani, F., Alfieri, S., Total mesopancreas excision for periampullary malignancy: a single-center propensity score-matched comparison of long-term outcomes, <<LANGENBECK'S ARCHIVES OF SURGERY>>, 2020; 405 (3): 303-312. [doi:10.1007/s00423-020-01873-4] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/174678]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/174678
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact