Ultrasound (US) has great potential as an outcome in rheumatoid arthritis trials for detecting bone erosions, synovitis, tendon disease, and enthesopathy. It has a number of distinct advantages over magnetic resonance imaging, including good patient tolerability and ability to scan multiple joints in a short period of time. However, there are scarce data regarding its validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness to change, making interpretation and comparison of studies difficult. In particular, there are limited data describing standardized scanning methodology and standardized definitions of US pathologies. This article presents the first report from the OMERACT ultrasound special interest group, which has compared US against the criteria of the OMERACT filter. Also proposed for the first time are consensus US definitions for common pathological lesions seen in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Wakefield, R. J., Balint, P. V., Szkudlarek, M., Filippucci, E., Backhaus, M., D'Agostino, M., Sanchez, E. N., Iagnocco, A., Schmidt, W. A., Bruyn, G. A. W., Bruyn, G., Kane, D., O'Connor, P. J., Manger, B., Joshua, F., Koski, J., Grassi, W., Lassere, M. N. D., Swen, N., Kainberger, F., Klauser, A., Ostergaard, M., Brown, A. K., Machold, K. P., Conaghan, P. G., Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology, <<THE JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY>>, 2005; 32 (12): 2485-2487 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/169485]

Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology

D'Agostino, Maria-Antonietta
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2005

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) has great potential as an outcome in rheumatoid arthritis trials for detecting bone erosions, synovitis, tendon disease, and enthesopathy. It has a number of distinct advantages over magnetic resonance imaging, including good patient tolerability and ability to scan multiple joints in a short period of time. However, there are scarce data regarding its validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness to change, making interpretation and comparison of studies difficult. In particular, there are limited data describing standardized scanning methodology and standardized definitions of US pathologies. This article presents the first report from the OMERACT ultrasound special interest group, which has compared US against the criteria of the OMERACT filter. Also proposed for the first time are consensus US definitions for common pathological lesions seen in patients with inflammatory arthritis.
2005
Inglese
Wakefield, R. J., Balint, P. V., Szkudlarek, M., Filippucci, E., Backhaus, M., D'Agostino, M., Sanchez, E. N., Iagnocco, A., Schmidt, W. A., Bruyn, G. A. W., Bruyn, G., Kane, D., O'Connor, P. J., Manger, B., Joshua, F., Koski, J., Grassi, W., Lassere, M. N. D., Swen, N., Kainberger, F., Klauser, A., Ostergaard, M., Brown, A. K., Machold, K. P., Conaghan, P. G., Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology, <<THE JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY>>, 2005; 32 (12): 2485-2487 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/169485]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/169485
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 213
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact