The " Discrimination" part of the OMERACT Filter asks whether a measure discriminates between situations that are of interest. " Feasibility" in the OMERACT Filter encompasses the practical considerations of using an instrument, including its ease of use, time to complete, monetary costs, and interpretability of the question(s) included in the instrument. Both the Discrimination and Reliability parts of the filter have been helpful but were agreed on primarily by consensus of OMERACT participants rather than through explicit evidence-based guidelines. In Filter 2.0 we wanted to improve this definition and provide specific guidance and advice to participants. © 2014. All rights reserved.

Wells, G., Beaton, D. E., Tugwell, P., Boers, M., Kirwan, J. R., Bingham, C. O., Boonen, A., Brooks, P., Conaghan, P. G., D'Agostino, M. A., Dougados, M., Furst, D. E., Gossec, L., Guillemin, F., Helliwell, P., Hewlett, S., Kvien, T. K., Landewe, R. B., March, L., Mease, P. J., Oostergaard, M., Simon, L., Singh, J. A., Strand, V., Van Der Heijde, D. M., Updating the omeract filter: Discrimination and feasibility, <<THE JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY>>, 2014; 41 (5): 1005-1010. [doi:10.3899/jrheum.131311] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/169156]

Updating the omeract filter: Discrimination and feasibility

D'Agostino, Maria Antonietta
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2014

Abstract

The " Discrimination" part of the OMERACT Filter asks whether a measure discriminates between situations that are of interest. " Feasibility" in the OMERACT Filter encompasses the practical considerations of using an instrument, including its ease of use, time to complete, monetary costs, and interpretability of the question(s) included in the instrument. Both the Discrimination and Reliability parts of the filter have been helpful but were agreed on primarily by consensus of OMERACT participants rather than through explicit evidence-based guidelines. In Filter 2.0 we wanted to improve this definition and provide specific guidance and advice to participants. © 2014. All rights reserved.
2014
Inglese
Wells, G., Beaton, D. E., Tugwell, P., Boers, M., Kirwan, J. R., Bingham, C. O., Boonen, A., Brooks, P., Conaghan, P. G., D'Agostino, M. A., Dougados, M., Furst, D. E., Gossec, L., Guillemin, F., Helliwell, P., Hewlett, S., Kvien, T. K., Landewe, R. B., March, L., Mease, P. J., Oostergaard, M., Simon, L., Singh, J. A., Strand, V., Van Der Heijde, D. M., Updating the omeract filter: Discrimination and feasibility, <<THE JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY>>, 2014; 41 (5): 1005-1010. [doi:10.3899/jrheum.131311] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/169156]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/169156
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact