It is unknown which is the best ventilatory approach in patients scheduled for gynecological robotic surgery in Deep Trendelenburg position in terms of respiratory mechanics. 40 patients were enrolled: 20 patients received a standard ventilation and 20 patients received a protective ventilation. Gas exchanges, respiratory mechanics and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of respiratory mechanics. In both groups, there was a significant reduction of static compliance between Baseline and Extubation Time (p < 0.01), and a significant increase of pulmonary pressure at the same times (p < 0.01). In both groups, a significant reduction of pH (p < 0.01) and a significant increase of PaCO 2 (p < 0.01) were observed between Baseline and Extubation Time. At the Extubation time, PaCO 2 was significantly higher during protective ventilation compared to standard ventilation. In this particular surgical setting, a protective ventilation strategy did not improve the respiratory mechanics compared to the standard ventilation strategy and was ineffective on post-operative gas exchanges.

Spinazzola, G., Ferrone, G., Cipriani, F., Caputo, C. T., Rossi, M., Conti, G., Effects of two different ventilation strategies on respiratory mechanics during robotic-gynecological surgery, <<RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY>>, 2019; 259 (-): 122-128. [doi:10.1016/j.resp.2018.08.012] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/168068]

Effects of two different ventilation strategies on respiratory mechanics during robotic-gynecological surgery

Cipriani, F.;Caputo, C. T.;Rossi, M.;Conti, G.
2019

Abstract

It is unknown which is the best ventilatory approach in patients scheduled for gynecological robotic surgery in Deep Trendelenburg position in terms of respiratory mechanics. 40 patients were enrolled: 20 patients received a standard ventilation and 20 patients received a protective ventilation. Gas exchanges, respiratory mechanics and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of respiratory mechanics. In both groups, there was a significant reduction of static compliance between Baseline and Extubation Time (p < 0.01), and a significant increase of pulmonary pressure at the same times (p < 0.01). In both groups, a significant reduction of pH (p < 0.01) and a significant increase of PaCO 2 (p < 0.01) were observed between Baseline and Extubation Time. At the Extubation time, PaCO 2 was significantly higher during protective ventilation compared to standard ventilation. In this particular surgical setting, a protective ventilation strategy did not improve the respiratory mechanics compared to the standard ventilation strategy and was ineffective on post-operative gas exchanges.
Inglese
Spinazzola, G., Ferrone, G., Cipriani, F., Caputo, C. T., Rossi, M., Conti, G., Effects of two different ventilation strategies on respiratory mechanics during robotic-gynecological surgery, <<RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY>>, 2019; 259 (-): 122-128. [doi:10.1016/j.resp.2018.08.012] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/168068]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/168068
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact