Background: This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of electrical stimulation of denervated muscle (ESDM) on recovery of patients with peripheral nerve injuries. Methods: We enrolled 38 patients with traumatic peripheral nerve injuries with axonal damage and clinical impairment of two muscles, who were randomly treated with real or sham electrical stimulation (ES). Clinical and neurophysiological examinations were performed before treatment, at the end of treatment, and 3 mo posttreatment, by the same physician who was blinded to the ES allocation. Results: All patients improved but there was no significant beneficial effect of ESDM compared with sham treatment. Conclusions: This study failed to demonstrate the efficacy of ESDM for peripheral nerve injuries. However, given the large number of variables related to ES and the heterogeneity in disease etiologies and clinical manifestations, future studies on homogeneous populations using different stimulation protocols may be useful.

Piccinini, G., Cuccagna, C., Caliandro, P., Coraci, D., Germanotta, M., Pecchioli, C., Padua, L., Efficacy of electrical stimulation of denervated muscle: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, <<MUSCLE & NERVE>>, 6; 61 (61): 773-778. [doi:10.1002/mus.26880] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/167483]

Efficacy of electrical stimulation of denervated muscle: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial

Piccinini G;Cuccagna C;Caliandro P;Coraci D;Germanotta M;Padua L
2020

Abstract

Background: This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of electrical stimulation of denervated muscle (ESDM) on recovery of patients with peripheral nerve injuries. Methods: We enrolled 38 patients with traumatic peripheral nerve injuries with axonal damage and clinical impairment of two muscles, who were randomly treated with real or sham electrical stimulation (ES). Clinical and neurophysiological examinations were performed before treatment, at the end of treatment, and 3 mo posttreatment, by the same physician who was blinded to the ES allocation. Results: All patients improved but there was no significant beneficial effect of ESDM compared with sham treatment. Conclusions: This study failed to demonstrate the efficacy of ESDM for peripheral nerve injuries. However, given the large number of variables related to ES and the heterogeneity in disease etiologies and clinical manifestations, future studies on homogeneous populations using different stimulation protocols may be useful.
eng
Piccinini, G., Cuccagna, C., Caliandro, P., Coraci, D., Germanotta, M., Pecchioli, C., Padua, L., Efficacy of electrical stimulation of denervated muscle: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, <>, 6; 61 (61): 773-778. [doi:10.1002/mus.26880] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/167483]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10807/167483
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact