Down syndrome (DS) is the most common genetic cause of intellectual disability worldwide. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the internal consistency reliability of eight language versions of the Family Management Measure (FaMM) and compare family management of DS across cultures. A total of 2,740 parents of individuals with DS from 11 countries completed the FaMM. The analysis provided evidence of internal consistency reliability exceeding.70 for four of six FaMM scales for the entire sample. Across countries, there was a pattern of positive family management. Cross-cultural comparisons revealed parents from Brazil, Spain, and the United States had the most positive family management and respondents from Ireland, Italy, Japan, and Korea had the least positive. The rankings were mixed for the four remaining countries. These findings provide evidence of overall strong internal consistency reliability of the FaMM. More cross-cultural research is needed to understand how social determinants of health influence family management in families of individuals with DS.

Van Riper, M., Knafl, G. J., Barbieri-Figueiredo, M. D. C., Caples, M., Choi, H., De Graaf, G., Duarte, E. D., Honda, J., Marta, E., Phetrasuwan, S., Alfieri, S., Angelo, M., Deoisres, W., Fleming, L., Dos Santos, A. S., Rocha Da Silva, M. J., Skelton, B., Van Der Veek, S., Knafl, K. A., Measurement of Family Management in Families of Individuals With Down Syndrome: A Cross-Cultural Investigation, <<JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING>>, N/A; (December): 1074840720975167-N/A/. [doi:10.1177/1074840720975167] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/166868]

Measurement of Family Management in Families of Individuals With Down Syndrome: A Cross-Cultural Investigation

Marta, Elena;Alfieri, Sara;
2020

Abstract

Down syndrome (DS) is the most common genetic cause of intellectual disability worldwide. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the internal consistency reliability of eight language versions of the Family Management Measure (FaMM) and compare family management of DS across cultures. A total of 2,740 parents of individuals with DS from 11 countries completed the FaMM. The analysis provided evidence of internal consistency reliability exceeding.70 for four of six FaMM scales for the entire sample. Across countries, there was a pattern of positive family management. Cross-cultural comparisons revealed parents from Brazil, Spain, and the United States had the most positive family management and respondents from Ireland, Italy, Japan, and Korea had the least positive. The rankings were mixed for the four remaining countries. These findings provide evidence of overall strong internal consistency reliability of the FaMM. More cross-cultural research is needed to understand how social determinants of health influence family management in families of individuals with DS.
2020
Inglese
Van Riper, M., Knafl, G. J., Barbieri-Figueiredo, M. D. C., Caples, M., Choi, H., De Graaf, G., Duarte, E. D., Honda, J., Marta, E., Phetrasuwan, S., Alfieri, S., Angelo, M., Deoisres, W., Fleming, L., Dos Santos, A. S., Rocha Da Silva, M. J., Skelton, B., Van Der Veek, S., Knafl, K. A., Measurement of Family Management in Families of Individuals With Down Syndrome: A Cross-Cultural Investigation, <<JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING>>, N/A; (December): 1074840720975167-N/A/. [doi:10.1177/1074840720975167] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/166868]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Van Riper et al 2020 Family Management in Families of Individuals with Down Syndrome A Cross-Cultural Study-1.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 231.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
231.72 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/166868
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact