Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, Italy was one of the worst-affected European countries. The rapid surge of cases and the limited capacity of intensive care unit departments have posed a serious threat to the Italian national health system. In this paper we describe the first response and the main measures carried by Italian policy makers, as coordinated by a governmental committee of public health experts, which have succeeded in preventing the pandemic from turning into a disaster. Early closure of the school, quarantine measures and lockdown were put in place and the response of the population has been good overall. Despite the Italian health care system of universal coverage is considered the second-best in the world, during phase 1, the Italian decentralisation and fragmentation of health services probably restricted timely interventions and effectiveness. In northern Italy, Lombardy, Emilia Romagna, Piedmont, and Veneto, which reported most of the Italian cases, carried out different strategies against COVID-19, with great differences in testing, quarantine, and public health procedures. The improvement of the epidemiological situation has allowed an easing of the restrictive measures, with a progressive restarting of work activities. The government and technical-scientific bodies have prepared health strategies to support a possible second epidemic wave in the autumn.

Magnavita, N., Sacco, A., Chirico, F., . Covid-19 pandemic in Italy: Pros and cons, <<ZESZYTY NAUKOWE OCHRONY ZDROWIA, ZDROWIE PUBLICZNE I ZARZADZANIE>>, 2020; (18 (1)): 32-35 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/163299]

. Covid-19 pandemic in Italy: Pros and cons

Magnavita, Nicola;Sacco, Angelo;Chirico, Francesco
2020

Abstract

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, Italy was one of the worst-affected European countries. The rapid surge of cases and the limited capacity of intensive care unit departments have posed a serious threat to the Italian national health system. In this paper we describe the first response and the main measures carried by Italian policy makers, as coordinated by a governmental committee of public health experts, which have succeeded in preventing the pandemic from turning into a disaster. Early closure of the school, quarantine measures and lockdown were put in place and the response of the population has been good overall. Despite the Italian health care system of universal coverage is considered the second-best in the world, during phase 1, the Italian decentralisation and fragmentation of health services probably restricted timely interventions and effectiveness. In northern Italy, Lombardy, Emilia Romagna, Piedmont, and Veneto, which reported most of the Italian cases, carried out different strategies against COVID-19, with great differences in testing, quarantine, and public health procedures. The improvement of the epidemiological situation has allowed an easing of the restrictive measures, with a progressive restarting of work activities. The government and technical-scientific bodies have prepared health strategies to support a possible second epidemic wave in the autumn.
2020
Inglese
Magnavita, N., Sacco, A., Chirico, F., . Covid-19 pandemic in Italy: Pros and cons, <<ZESZYTY NAUKOWE OCHRONY ZDROWIA, ZDROWIE PUBLICZNE I ZARZADZANIE>>, 2020; (18 (1)): 32-35 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/163299]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ZNOZ 18_1 2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia file ?: Postprint (versione finale dell’autore successiva alla peer-review)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 919.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
919.91 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/163299
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact