Six components of partial resistance (RCs) were studied in 15 grapevine varieties with partial resistance to Plasmopara viticola: (i) infection frequency (IFR, proportion of inoculation sites showing sporulation), (ii) latent period (LP50, degree-days between inoculation and appearance of 50% of the final number of sporulating lesions), (iii) lesion size (LS, area of single lesions in mm2), (iv) production of sporangia (SPOR, number of sporangia produced per lesion, and SPOR’, number of sporangia produced per mm2 of lesion), (v) infectious period (IP, number of sporulation events on a lesion), and (vi) infectivity of sporangia (INF, infection efficiency of sporangia produced on resistant varieties). Artificial inoculation monocycle experiments were conducted for a 3-year period on leaves collected at leaf development, flowering, and fruit development. Compared to the susceptible variety ‘Merlot’, the partially resistant varieties showed reduced IFR, longer LP, smaller LS, fewer SPOR and SPOR’, shorter IP, and lower INF. At leaf development, IFR, SPOR, and INF were higher and LP was shorter than at flowering and fruit development. RCs analysis through monocyclic experiments provides reliable assessments of the resistance response of grapevine accessions. The workload required for routine assessment in breeding programs could be reduced by measuring IFR and SPOR, while producing robust results.

Bove, F., Rossi, V., Components of partial resistance to Plasmopara viticola enable complete phenotypic characterization of grapevine varieties, <<SCIENTIFIC REPORTS>>, 2020; 10 (1): 1-12. [doi:10.1038/s41598-020-57482-0] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/153747]

Components of partial resistance to Plasmopara viticola enable complete phenotypic characterization of grapevine varieties

Bove, Federica
Primo
;
Rossi, Vittorio
Ultimo
2020

Abstract

Six components of partial resistance (RCs) were studied in 15 grapevine varieties with partial resistance to Plasmopara viticola: (i) infection frequency (IFR, proportion of inoculation sites showing sporulation), (ii) latent period (LP50, degree-days between inoculation and appearance of 50% of the final number of sporulating lesions), (iii) lesion size (LS, area of single lesions in mm2), (iv) production of sporangia (SPOR, number of sporangia produced per lesion, and SPOR’, number of sporangia produced per mm2 of lesion), (v) infectious period (IP, number of sporulation events on a lesion), and (vi) infectivity of sporangia (INF, infection efficiency of sporangia produced on resistant varieties). Artificial inoculation monocycle experiments were conducted for a 3-year period on leaves collected at leaf development, flowering, and fruit development. Compared to the susceptible variety ‘Merlot’, the partially resistant varieties showed reduced IFR, longer LP, smaller LS, fewer SPOR and SPOR’, shorter IP, and lower INF. At leaf development, IFR, SPOR, and INF were higher and LP was shorter than at flowering and fruit development. RCs analysis through monocyclic experiments provides reliable assessments of the resistance response of grapevine accessions. The workload required for routine assessment in breeding programs could be reduced by measuring IFR and SPOR, while producing robust results.
2020
Inglese
Bove, F., Rossi, V., Components of partial resistance to Plasmopara viticola enable complete phenotypic characterization of grapevine varieties, <<SCIENTIFIC REPORTS>>, 2020; 10 (1): 1-12. [doi:10.1038/s41598-020-57482-0] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/153747]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s41598-020-57482-0.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.28 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.28 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/153747
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact