Aim: Despite the increasing adoption of parenchymal-sparing procedures, pneumonectomy is still necessary in several pleural and pulmonary (benign or malignant) diseases. We reviewed clinical data of a large cohort of patients treated by pneumonectomy with the aim of better define its impact on early and long-term results. Methods: Clinical and pathological characteristics of all consecutive patients treated by pneumonectomy between January 2005 and May 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty- and 90-day mortality, as well as long-term survival was assessed. Factors associated to long-term survival were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Evaluation of quality of life was carried out by a standard questionnaire (SF-12) administrated by phone to patients surviving beyond 1 year. Results: A total of 398 patients (293 men; mean age 61 ± 10.9 years) were operated on in the study period. Indication was malignancy in 380 patients (350 primary lung cancers). Thirty-day mortality was 9 % (right: 12.6 % vs. left: 6.3 %, p = 0.013), significantly correlating with age (p = 0.021), comorbidities (p = 0.034), PS > 1 (p = 0.018), preoperative dyspnea (p = 0.0013), and FEV1 (p = 0.0071). Overall 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year survival rates were 76.6, 46.6, 34.4, and 29.2 %. In case of primary lung cancer, these figures were 76.8, 46.4, 34.5, and 29.7 %. At univariate analysis, a less favorable survival was associated to PS > 1 (p = 0.0078), right side (p = 0.044), occurrence of postoperative complications (p = 0.00079), and T3-4 status (p = 0.013). At multivariate analysis, PS > 1, right side, and occurrence of postoperative complications were identified as independent worse prognostic factors. SF12 physical score was 39.1 ± 9.0 and was correlated to the presence of preoperative symptoms (p = 0.013). Mental score was 50.68 ± 9.63 and was correlated to preoperative FEV1/FVC ratio (p = 0.023) and side of disease (p = 0.023). Conclusion: In current practice, pneumonectomy is still performed for malignancy, sometimes after induction treatment. High postoperative morbidity and mortality are observed; however, at a farer interval time point, long-term survival with preserved quality of life can be observed.

Janet-Vendroux, A., Loi, M., Bobbio, A., Lococo, F., Lupo, A., Ledinot, P., Magdeleinat, P., Roche, N., Damotte, D., Regnard, J. -., Alifano, M., Which is the Role of Pneumonectomy in the Era of Parenchymal-Sparing Procedures? Early/Long-Term Survival and Functional Results of a Single-Center Experience, <<LUNG>>, 2015; 193 (6): 965-973. [doi:10.1007/s00408-015-9810-y] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/152056]

Which is the Role of Pneumonectomy in the Era of Parenchymal-Sparing Procedures? Early/Long-Term Survival and Functional Results of a Single-Center Experience

Lococo, Filippo;
2015

Abstract

Aim: Despite the increasing adoption of parenchymal-sparing procedures, pneumonectomy is still necessary in several pleural and pulmonary (benign or malignant) diseases. We reviewed clinical data of a large cohort of patients treated by pneumonectomy with the aim of better define its impact on early and long-term results. Methods: Clinical and pathological characteristics of all consecutive patients treated by pneumonectomy between January 2005 and May 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty- and 90-day mortality, as well as long-term survival was assessed. Factors associated to long-term survival were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Evaluation of quality of life was carried out by a standard questionnaire (SF-12) administrated by phone to patients surviving beyond 1 year. Results: A total of 398 patients (293 men; mean age 61 ± 10.9 years) were operated on in the study period. Indication was malignancy in 380 patients (350 primary lung cancers). Thirty-day mortality was 9 % (right: 12.6 % vs. left: 6.3 %, p = 0.013), significantly correlating with age (p = 0.021), comorbidities (p = 0.034), PS > 1 (p = 0.018), preoperative dyspnea (p = 0.0013), and FEV1 (p = 0.0071). Overall 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year survival rates were 76.6, 46.6, 34.4, and 29.2 %. In case of primary lung cancer, these figures were 76.8, 46.4, 34.5, and 29.7 %. At univariate analysis, a less favorable survival was associated to PS > 1 (p = 0.0078), right side (p = 0.044), occurrence of postoperative complications (p = 0.00079), and T3-4 status (p = 0.013). At multivariate analysis, PS > 1, right side, and occurrence of postoperative complications were identified as independent worse prognostic factors. SF12 physical score was 39.1 ± 9.0 and was correlated to the presence of preoperative symptoms (p = 0.013). Mental score was 50.68 ± 9.63 and was correlated to preoperative FEV1/FVC ratio (p = 0.023) and side of disease (p = 0.023). Conclusion: In current practice, pneumonectomy is still performed for malignancy, sometimes after induction treatment. High postoperative morbidity and mortality are observed; however, at a farer interval time point, long-term survival with preserved quality of life can be observed.
2015
Inglese
Janet-Vendroux, A., Loi, M., Bobbio, A., Lococo, F., Lupo, A., Ledinot, P., Magdeleinat, P., Roche, N., Damotte, D., Regnard, J. -., Alifano, M., Which is the Role of Pneumonectomy in the Era of Parenchymal-Sparing Procedures? Early/Long-Term Survival and Functional Results of a Single-Center Experience, <<LUNG>>, 2015; 193 (6): 965-973. [doi:10.1007/s00408-015-9810-y] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/152056]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/152056
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact