PURPOSE: To analyze and provide an overview of the incidence, management, and prevention of conjunctival erosion in Argus II clinical trial subjects and postapproval patients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis followed the results of 274 patients treated with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System between June 2007 and November 2017, including 30 subjects from the US and European clinical trials, and 244 patients in the postapproval phase. Results were gathered for incidence of a serious adverse event, incidence of conjunctival erosion, occurrence sites, rates of erosion, and erosion timing. RESULTS: Overall, 60% of subjects in the clinical trial subjects versus 83% of patients in the postapproval phase did not experience device- or surgery-related serious adverse events. In the postapproval phase, conjunctival erosion had an incidence rate of 6.2% over 5 years and 11 months. In 55% of conjunctival erosion cases, erosion occurred in the inferotemporal quadrant, 25% in the superotemporal quadrant, and 20% in both. Sixty percent of the erosion events occurred in the first 15 months after implantation, and 85% within the first 2.5 years. CONCLUSION: Reducing occurrence of conjunctival erosion in patients with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis requires identification and minimization of risk factors before and during implantation. Implementing inverted sutures at the implant tabs, use of graft material at these locations as well as Mersilene rather than nylon sutures, and accurate Tenon's and conjunctiva closure are recommended for consideration in all patients.

Rizzo, S., Barale, P. -., Ayello-Scheer, S., Devenyi, R. G., Delyfer, M. -., Korobelnik, J. -., Rachitskaya, A., Yuan, A., Jayasundera, K. T., Zacks, D. N., Handa, J. T., Montezuma, S. R., Koozekanani, D., Stanga, P. E., Da Cruz, L., Walter, P., Augustin, A. J., Chizzolini, M., Olmos De Koo, L. C., Ho, A. C., Kirchhof, B., Hahn, P., Vajzovic, L., Iezzi, R., Gaucher, D., Arevalo, J. F., Gregori, N. Z., Grisanti, S., Ozmert, E., Yoon, Y. H., Kokame, G. T., Lim, J. I., Szurman, P., De Juan, E., Rezende, F. A., Salzmann, J., Richard, G., Huang, S. S., Merlini, F., Patel, U., Cruz, C., Greenberg, R. J., Justus, S., Cinelli, L., Humayun, M. S., ADVERSE EVENTS OF THE ARGUS II RETINAL PROSTHESIS: Incidence, Causes, and Best Practices for Managing and Preventing Conjunctival Erosion, <<RETINA>>, 2020; 40 (2): 303-311. [doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002394] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/150741]

ADVERSE EVENTS OF THE ARGUS II RETINAL PROSTHESIS: Incidence, Causes, and Best Practices for Managing and Preventing Conjunctival Erosion

Rizzo, Stanislao
;
2020

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze and provide an overview of the incidence, management, and prevention of conjunctival erosion in Argus II clinical trial subjects and postapproval patients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis followed the results of 274 patients treated with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System between June 2007 and November 2017, including 30 subjects from the US and European clinical trials, and 244 patients in the postapproval phase. Results were gathered for incidence of a serious adverse event, incidence of conjunctival erosion, occurrence sites, rates of erosion, and erosion timing. RESULTS: Overall, 60% of subjects in the clinical trial subjects versus 83% of patients in the postapproval phase did not experience device- or surgery-related serious adverse events. In the postapproval phase, conjunctival erosion had an incidence rate of 6.2% over 5 years and 11 months. In 55% of conjunctival erosion cases, erosion occurred in the inferotemporal quadrant, 25% in the superotemporal quadrant, and 20% in both. Sixty percent of the erosion events occurred in the first 15 months after implantation, and 85% within the first 2.5 years. CONCLUSION: Reducing occurrence of conjunctival erosion in patients with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis requires identification and minimization of risk factors before and during implantation. Implementing inverted sutures at the implant tabs, use of graft material at these locations as well as Mersilene rather than nylon sutures, and accurate Tenon's and conjunctiva closure are recommended for consideration in all patients.
2020
Inglese
Rizzo, S., Barale, P. -., Ayello-Scheer, S., Devenyi, R. G., Delyfer, M. -., Korobelnik, J. -., Rachitskaya, A., Yuan, A., Jayasundera, K. T., Zacks, D. N., Handa, J. T., Montezuma, S. R., Koozekanani, D., Stanga, P. E., Da Cruz, L., Walter, P., Augustin, A. J., Chizzolini, M., Olmos De Koo, L. C., Ho, A. C., Kirchhof, B., Hahn, P., Vajzovic, L., Iezzi, R., Gaucher, D., Arevalo, J. F., Gregori, N. Z., Grisanti, S., Ozmert, E., Yoon, Y. H., Kokame, G. T., Lim, J. I., Szurman, P., De Juan, E., Rezende, F. A., Salzmann, J., Richard, G., Huang, S. S., Merlini, F., Patel, U., Cruz, C., Greenberg, R. J., Justus, S., Cinelli, L., Humayun, M. S., ADVERSE EVENTS OF THE ARGUS II RETINAL PROSTHESIS: Incidence, Causes, and Best Practices for Managing and Preventing Conjunctival Erosion, <<RETINA>>, 2020; 40 (2): 303-311. [doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002394] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/150741]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/150741
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact