Background: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and feeding intolerance are common conditions in preterm infants and among the major causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity. For many years, preterm infants with RDS have been treated with mechanical ventilation, increasing risks of acute lung injury and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. In recent years non-invasive ventilation techniques have been developed. Showing similar efficacy and risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) have become the most widespread techniques in neonatal intensive care units. However, their impact on nutrition, particularly on feeding tolerance and risk of complications, is still unknown in preterm infants. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of NCPAP vs HHHFNC on enteral feeding and to identify the most suitable technique for preterm infants with RDS. Methods: A multicenter randomized single-blind controlled trial was designed. All preterm infants with a gestational age of 25-29 weeks treated with NCPAP or HHHFNC for RDS and demonstrating stability for at least 48 h along with the compliance with inclusion criteria (age less than 7 days, need for non-invasive respiratory support, suitability to start enteral feeding) will be enrolled in the study and randomized to the NCPAP or HHHFNC arm. All patients will be monitored until discharge, and data will be analyzed according to an intention-to-treat model. The primary outcome is the time to reach full enteral feeding, while parameters of respiratory support, feeding tolerance, and overall health status will be evaluated as secondary outcomes. The sample size was calculated at 141 patients per arm. Discussion: The identification of the most suitable technique (NCPAP vs HHHFNC) for preterm infants with feeding intolerance could reduce gastrointestinal complications, improve growth, and reduce hospital length of stay, thus improving clinical outcomes and reducing health costs. The evaluation of the timing of oral feeding could be useful in understanding the influence that these techniques could have on the development of sucking-swallow coordination. Moreover, the evaluation of the response to NCPAP and HHHFNC could clarify their efficacy as a treatment for RDS in extremely preterm infants. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03548324. Registered on 7 June 2018.

Cresi, F., Maggiora, E., Borgione, S. M., Spada, E., Coscia, E., Bertino, E., Meneghin, F., Corvaglia, L. T., Ventura, M. L., Lista, G., Mosca, F., Orsi, A., Mercadante, D., Martinelli, S., Ilardi, L., Proto, A., Gatto, S., Aceti, A., Sandri, F., Chakrokh, R., Laforgia, N., Di Mauro, A., Baldassarre, M. E., Del Vecchio, A., Petrillo, F., Spalierno, M. P., Raimondi, F., Capasso, L., Palma, M., Farina, D., Campagnoli, M. F., Boetti, T., Logrippo, F., Agosti, M., Morlacchi, L., Perniciaro, S., Dani, C., Elia, S., Vento, G., Maggio, L., Stronati, M., Civardi, E., Lidia, G., Angela, B., Enteral Nutrition Tolerance and REspiratory Support (ENTARES) Study in preterm infants: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, <<TRIALS>>, 2019; 20 (1): 67-N/A. [doi:10.1186/s13063-018-3119-0] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/147550]

Enteral Nutrition Tolerance and REspiratory Support (ENTARES) Study in preterm infants: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Coscia, Emanuele;Vento, Giovanni;Maggio, Luca;
2019

Abstract

Background: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and feeding intolerance are common conditions in preterm infants and among the major causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity. For many years, preterm infants with RDS have been treated with mechanical ventilation, increasing risks of acute lung injury and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. In recent years non-invasive ventilation techniques have been developed. Showing similar efficacy and risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) have become the most widespread techniques in neonatal intensive care units. However, their impact on nutrition, particularly on feeding tolerance and risk of complications, is still unknown in preterm infants. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of NCPAP vs HHHFNC on enteral feeding and to identify the most suitable technique for preterm infants with RDS. Methods: A multicenter randomized single-blind controlled trial was designed. All preterm infants with a gestational age of 25-29 weeks treated with NCPAP or HHHFNC for RDS and demonstrating stability for at least 48 h along with the compliance with inclusion criteria (age less than 7 days, need for non-invasive respiratory support, suitability to start enteral feeding) will be enrolled in the study and randomized to the NCPAP or HHHFNC arm. All patients will be monitored until discharge, and data will be analyzed according to an intention-to-treat model. The primary outcome is the time to reach full enteral feeding, while parameters of respiratory support, feeding tolerance, and overall health status will be evaluated as secondary outcomes. The sample size was calculated at 141 patients per arm. Discussion: The identification of the most suitable technique (NCPAP vs HHHFNC) for preterm infants with feeding intolerance could reduce gastrointestinal complications, improve growth, and reduce hospital length of stay, thus improving clinical outcomes and reducing health costs. The evaluation of the timing of oral feeding could be useful in understanding the influence that these techniques could have on the development of sucking-swallow coordination. Moreover, the evaluation of the response to NCPAP and HHHFNC could clarify their efficacy as a treatment for RDS in extremely preterm infants. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03548324. Registered on 7 June 2018.
2019
Inglese
Cresi, F., Maggiora, E., Borgione, S. M., Spada, E., Coscia, E., Bertino, E., Meneghin, F., Corvaglia, L. T., Ventura, M. L., Lista, G., Mosca, F., Orsi, A., Mercadante, D., Martinelli, S., Ilardi, L., Proto, A., Gatto, S., Aceti, A., Sandri, F., Chakrokh, R., Laforgia, N., Di Mauro, A., Baldassarre, M. E., Del Vecchio, A., Petrillo, F., Spalierno, M. P., Raimondi, F., Capasso, L., Palma, M., Farina, D., Campagnoli, M. F., Boetti, T., Logrippo, F., Agosti, M., Morlacchi, L., Perniciaro, S., Dani, C., Elia, S., Vento, G., Maggio, L., Stronati, M., Civardi, E., Lidia, G., Angela, B., Enteral Nutrition Tolerance and REspiratory Support (ENTARES) Study in preterm infants: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, <<TRIALS>>, 2019; 20 (1): 67-N/A. [doi:10.1186/s13063-018-3119-0] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/147550]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
147550OA.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.26 MB
Formato Unknown
1.26 MB Unknown Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/147550
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact