The law of some countries, like Italy, explicitly grants museums and other cultural institutions exclusive reproduction rights over works of art exhibited or stored therein. In 2017, at the request of the Italian Ministry for Culture and Heritage, the Tribunal of Florence issued an injunction prohibiting a travel agency based in Italy from further using “in Italy and in the rest of Europe” an unauthorised reproduction of the “David”, a statue by Michelangelo, which the agency had included in its website and in advertising material distributed in Italy and abroad. The paper discusses the issues surrounding the protection of reproduction rights in cross-border cases under the Rome II regulation. It also hints at the advantages that the adoption of harmonised substantive standards at EU level regarding the exploitation of these rights would entail for the effective protection of cultural heritage, while giving due account to competing rights, such as the so-called freedom of panorama, i.e., the right to take and reproduce pictures of works of art located in, or visible from, a public place.

Franzina, P., Jayme, E., Zum Schutz der Reproduktionsrechte von Museen an ihren Kunstwerken im internationalen Rechtsverkehr: Betrachtungen zu der Entscheidung des Tribunale di Firenze vom 26.10.2017 in Sachen des „David“ von Michelangelo, <<IPRAX. PRAXIS DES INTERNATIONALEN PRIVAT- UND VERFAHRENSRECHTS>>, 2018; 38 (4): 437-438 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/146606]

Zum Schutz der Reproduktionsrechte von Museen an ihren Kunstwerken im internationalen Rechtsverkehr: Betrachtungen zu der Entscheidung des Tribunale di Firenze vom 26.10.2017 in Sachen des „David“ von Michelangelo

Franzina, Pietro;
2018

Abstract

The law of some countries, like Italy, explicitly grants museums and other cultural institutions exclusive reproduction rights over works of art exhibited or stored therein. In 2017, at the request of the Italian Ministry for Culture and Heritage, the Tribunal of Florence issued an injunction prohibiting a travel agency based in Italy from further using “in Italy and in the rest of Europe” an unauthorised reproduction of the “David”, a statue by Michelangelo, which the agency had included in its website and in advertising material distributed in Italy and abroad. The paper discusses the issues surrounding the protection of reproduction rights in cross-border cases under the Rome II regulation. It also hints at the advantages that the adoption of harmonised substantive standards at EU level regarding the exploitation of these rights would entail for the effective protection of cultural heritage, while giving due account to competing rights, such as the so-called freedom of panorama, i.e., the right to take and reproduce pictures of works of art located in, or visible from, a public place.
2018
Tedesco
Franzina, P., Jayme, E., Zum Schutz der Reproduktionsrechte von Museen an ihren Kunstwerken im internationalen Rechtsverkehr: Betrachtungen zu der Entscheidung des Tribunale di Firenze vom 26.10.2017 in Sachen des „David“ von Michelangelo, <<IPRAX. PRAXIS DES INTERNATIONALEN PRIVAT- UND VERFAHRENSRECHTS>>, 2018; 38 (4): 437-438 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/146606]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/146606
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact