Medical consultations in chronic care can be described as advice-seeking activity types, in which advice-giving is the main discursive activity that entails an argumentative component. This component appears during deliberative and evaluative sequences. In the first case, participants need to find agreement on a solution to a problem. In the second case, participants need to find agreement on how to assess facts in order to make decisions based on those assessments. We are particularly interested in understanding clinicians’ use of argumentation 1. when deciding for a certain treatment; 2. when patients disagree with them. In order to do this, we propose the analysis of a corpus composed of interviews with chronic care doctors, collected in Italy and in the Chinese region of Inner Mongolia.

Bigi, S. F. M., Sigen Tuo, &., Piccinini, C., Understanding the role of argumentation in chronic care encounters: A comparative analysis of a multicultural corpus, Contributed paper, in Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, (University of Amsterdam, 03-06 July 2018), Sic Sat, Amsterdam 2019: 72-79 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/145744]

Understanding the role of argumentation in chronic care encounters: A comparative analysis of a multicultural corpus

Bigi, Sarah Francesca Maria
;
2019

Abstract

Medical consultations in chronic care can be described as advice-seeking activity types, in which advice-giving is the main discursive activity that entails an argumentative component. This component appears during deliberative and evaluative sequences. In the first case, participants need to find agreement on a solution to a problem. In the second case, participants need to find agreement on how to assess facts in order to make decisions based on those assessments. We are particularly interested in understanding clinicians’ use of argumentation 1. when deciding for a certain treatment; 2. when patients disagree with them. In order to do this, we propose the analysis of a corpus composed of interviews with chronic care doctors, collected in Italy and in the Chinese region of Inner Mongolia.
2019
Inglese
Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
2018 International Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference
University of Amsterdam
Contributed paper
3-lug-2018
6-lug-2018
9789090316369
Sic Sat
Bigi, S. F. M., Sigen Tuo, &., Piccinini, C., Understanding the role of argumentation in chronic care encounters: A comparative analysis of a multicultural corpus, Contributed paper, in Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, (University of Amsterdam, 03-06 July 2018), Sic Sat, Amsterdam 2019: 72-79 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/145744]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/145744
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact