The present debate takes cue from the recent ruling of the Joint Divisions of the Supreme Court of Cassation, which have addressed the issue of the validity of the investment services framework contract that has been produced in a civil trial and is signed by only one party - namely, by the client. Scholars from different disciplines participate in such debate.
Perrone, A., Denozza, F., Mirone, A., Semeghini, D., Modica, L., Natoli, R., Il contratto "monofirma" e le Sezioni Unite della Cassazione. Un dialogo a più voci, <<ORIZZONTI DEL DIRITTO COMMERCIALE>>, VI; (2): 1-13 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/145312]
Il contratto "monofirma" e le Sezioni Unite della Cassazione. Un dialogo a più voci
Perrone, Andrea
Primo
Supervision
;Semeghini, Danilo
;
2018
Abstract
The present debate takes cue from the recent ruling of the Joint Divisions of the Supreme Court of Cassation, which have addressed the issue of the validity of the investment services framework contract that has been produced in a civil trial and is signed by only one party - namely, by the client. Scholars from different disciplines participate in such debate.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
