Aim: With the final aim to explore the first-line treatment options for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we performed a systematic review and literature-based meta-analysis of available clinical trials exploring immunotherapy in combination versus standard histology-based chemotherapy. Materials & methods: We evaluated interactions according to type of treatment-add-on strategy: immunotherapy in combination versus standard chemotherapy-based regimens. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted and cumulated. Results: Seven trials (4278 patients) were included. The addition of immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy-based regimens significantly increased OS (HR 0.74; p = 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.61; p < 0.0001) compared with standard-of-care in NSCLC patients in first-line setting. Conclusion: Immunotherapy-based regimens constantly improved OS and PFS compared with chemotherapy in first-line treatment of nononcogene-addicted NSCLC.

Rossi, A., Noia, V. D., Gkountakos, A., D'Argento, E., Sartori, G., Vita, E., Monteverdi, S., Lombardo, F., Iacovelli, R., Carbognin, L., Sperduti, I., Milella, M., Tortora, G., Bria, E., Pilotto, S., PD-L1 for selecting non-small-cell lung cancer patients for first-line immuno-chemotherapy combination: A systematic review and meta-analysis, <<IMMUNOTHERAPY>>, 2019; 11 (10): 921-930. [doi:10.2217/imt-2018-0198] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/139987]

PD-L1 for selecting non-small-cell lung cancer patients for first-line immuno-chemotherapy combination: A systematic review and meta-analysis

D'Argento, E.;Vita, E.;Iacovelli, R.;Tortora, G.;Bria, E.;
2019

Abstract

Aim: With the final aim to explore the first-line treatment options for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we performed a systematic review and literature-based meta-analysis of available clinical trials exploring immunotherapy in combination versus standard histology-based chemotherapy. Materials & methods: We evaluated interactions according to type of treatment-add-on strategy: immunotherapy in combination versus standard chemotherapy-based regimens. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted and cumulated. Results: Seven trials (4278 patients) were included. The addition of immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy-based regimens significantly increased OS (HR 0.74; p = 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.61; p < 0.0001) compared with standard-of-care in NSCLC patients in first-line setting. Conclusion: Immunotherapy-based regimens constantly improved OS and PFS compared with chemotherapy in first-line treatment of nononcogene-addicted NSCLC.
2019
Inglese
Rossi, A., Noia, V. D., Gkountakos, A., D'Argento, E., Sartori, G., Vita, E., Monteverdi, S., Lombardo, F., Iacovelli, R., Carbognin, L., Sperduti, I., Milella, M., Tortora, G., Bria, E., Pilotto, S., PD-L1 for selecting non-small-cell lung cancer patients for first-line immuno-chemotherapy combination: A systematic review and meta-analysis, <<IMMUNOTHERAPY>>, 2019; 11 (10): 921-930. [doi:10.2217/imt-2018-0198] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/139987]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/139987
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact