Background: Usefulness of intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic management (GDHM) for patients without comorbidities is debated. After clinical implementation of a pulse contour analysis-guided GDHM protocol, which foresees early vasopressor use for recruiting unstressed volume, we conducted a matched-controlled analysis to explore its impact on the amount of fluids intraoperatively administered to patients without comorbidities who underwent extended abdominal surgery for ovarian cancer. Methods: After 1:1 matching accounting for body mass index, oncologic disease severity and intraoperative blood losses, 22 patients treated according to this GDHM protocol were compared to a control group of 22 patients who had been managed according to the clinical decision of attending physicians, taken without advanced monitoring. Results are displayed as median[interquartile range]. Results: All analyzed patients underwent radical hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, bowel resection, peritonectomy and extended pelvic/periaortic lymphadenectomy; median length of surgery was 517[480–605] min in patients receiving GDHM and 507[480–600] min in control group. Intraoperatively, patients undergoing GDHM received less fluids (crystalloids 2950[2700–3300] vs. 5150[4700–6000] mL, p < 0.001; colloids 100[50–200] vs. 750[500–1000] mL, p < 0.001) and showed a trend to more frequent vasopressor administration (32 vs 9%, p = 0.13). Greater intraoperative diuresis (540[480–620] mL vs. 450[400–500] mL, p = 0.007), lower blood lactates at surgery end (1.5[1.1–2] vs. 4.1[3.3–5] mmol/L, p < 0.001), shorter time to bowel function recovery (1 [1, 2] vs. 4 [3–5] days, p < 0.001) and hospital discharge (7 [6–8] vs 12 [9–16] days, p < 0.0001) were detected in patients receiving GDHM. Conclusions: In high-tumor load gynaecological patients without comorbidities who receive radical and prolonged surgery, intraoperative use of this novel GDHM protocol helped limit fluids administration with safety.

Russo, A., Aceto, P., Grieco, D. L., Anzellotti, G. M., Perilli, V., Costantini, B., Lamborghini, B. R., Scambia, G., Sollazzi, L., Antonelli, M., Goal-directed hemodynamic management in patients undergoing primary debulking gynaecological surgery: A matched-controlled precision medicine study, <<GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY>>, 2018; 151 (2): 299-305. [doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.034] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/135034]

Goal-directed hemodynamic management in patients undergoing primary debulking gynaecological surgery: A matched-controlled precision medicine study

Aceto, Paola;Grieco, Domenico Luca;Anzellotti, Gian Marco;Perilli, Valter;Costantini, Barbara;Lamborghini, Bruno Romano;Scambia, Giovanni;Sollazzi, Liliana;Antonelli, Massimo
2018

Abstract

Background: Usefulness of intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic management (GDHM) for patients without comorbidities is debated. After clinical implementation of a pulse contour analysis-guided GDHM protocol, which foresees early vasopressor use for recruiting unstressed volume, we conducted a matched-controlled analysis to explore its impact on the amount of fluids intraoperatively administered to patients without comorbidities who underwent extended abdominal surgery for ovarian cancer. Methods: After 1:1 matching accounting for body mass index, oncologic disease severity and intraoperative blood losses, 22 patients treated according to this GDHM protocol were compared to a control group of 22 patients who had been managed according to the clinical decision of attending physicians, taken without advanced monitoring. Results are displayed as median[interquartile range]. Results: All analyzed patients underwent radical hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, bowel resection, peritonectomy and extended pelvic/periaortic lymphadenectomy; median length of surgery was 517[480–605] min in patients receiving GDHM and 507[480–600] min in control group. Intraoperatively, patients undergoing GDHM received less fluids (crystalloids 2950[2700–3300] vs. 5150[4700–6000] mL, p < 0.001; colloids 100[50–200] vs. 750[500–1000] mL, p < 0.001) and showed a trend to more frequent vasopressor administration (32 vs 9%, p = 0.13). Greater intraoperative diuresis (540[480–620] mL vs. 450[400–500] mL, p = 0.007), lower blood lactates at surgery end (1.5[1.1–2] vs. 4.1[3.3–5] mmol/L, p < 0.001), shorter time to bowel function recovery (1 [1, 2] vs. 4 [3–5] days, p < 0.001) and hospital discharge (7 [6–8] vs 12 [9–16] days, p < 0.0001) were detected in patients receiving GDHM. Conclusions: In high-tumor load gynaecological patients without comorbidities who receive radical and prolonged surgery, intraoperative use of this novel GDHM protocol helped limit fluids administration with safety.
2018
Inglese
Russo, A., Aceto, P., Grieco, D. L., Anzellotti, G. M., Perilli, V., Costantini, B., Lamborghini, B. R., Scambia, G., Sollazzi, L., Antonelli, M., Goal-directed hemodynamic management in patients undergoing primary debulking gynaecological surgery: A matched-controlled precision medicine study, <<GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY>>, 2018; 151 (2): 299-305. [doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.034] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/135034]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
135034.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 903.31 kB
Formato Unknown
903.31 kB Unknown   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/135034
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact