In 1996, Felsenthal and Machover proposed a bargaining procedure for a valuable payoff in cooperative and simple games. They proved that the value underlying their bargaining scheme was the Shapley value by showing that it verifies the axioms that Shapley proposed for characterizing his value. They remarked that a direct proof of the result involves rather formidable combinatorial difficulties, but that it has some independent interest. In this paper, we prove such a combinatorial result and obtain a formula for the Shapley value that has a great potential to be extended to more general classes of games.

Bernardi, G., Freixas, J., The Shapley value analyzed under the Felsenthal and Machover bargaining model, <<PUBLIC CHOICE>>, 2018; 176 (3-4): 557-565. [doi:10.1007/s11127-018-0560-2] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/133917]

The Shapley value analyzed under the Felsenthal and Machover bargaining model

Bernardi, Giulia
;
2018

Abstract

In 1996, Felsenthal and Machover proposed a bargaining procedure for a valuable payoff in cooperative and simple games. They proved that the value underlying their bargaining scheme was the Shapley value by showing that it verifies the axioms that Shapley proposed for characterizing his value. They remarked that a direct proof of the result involves rather formidable combinatorial difficulties, but that it has some independent interest. In this paper, we prove such a combinatorial result and obtain a formula for the Shapley value that has a great potential to be extended to more general classes of games.
2018
Inglese
Bernardi, G., Freixas, J., The Shapley value analyzed under the Felsenthal and Machover bargaining model, <<PUBLIC CHOICE>>, 2018; 176 (3-4): 557-565. [doi:10.1007/s11127-018-0560-2] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/133917]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/133917
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact