Much of the empirical literature analysing the relation between environmental innovation and competitiveness has focused on the question whether "it pays to be green". We differentiate between different types of environmental innovations, which will be disentangled in those aiming at reducing the negative externalities and those allowing for efficiency increases and cost savings. What we analyse is at first the extent to which these two typologies have impacts on firms' profitability with opposite signs, and, secondly, whether the motivations driving the adoption of those innovations make the difference in terms of economic gains. We find empirical evidence that both the typology of Environmental Innovation and the driver of their adoption affect the sign of the relationship between competitiveness and environmental performance. Innovations leading to a reduction in the use of energy or materials per unit of output positively affect firms' competitiveness. Contrarily, externality reducing innovations hamper firms' competitiveness. The empirical strategy is based on a sample of German firms and makes use of a merge of two waves of the Mannheim Innovation Panel in 2011 and 2009 that allow overcoming some endogeneity issues which may arise in a cross-section setting. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Ghisetti, C., Rennings, K., Environmental innovations and profitability: How does it pay to be green? An empirical analysis on the German innovation survey, <<JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION>>, 2014; 75 (75): 106-117. [doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.097] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/131690]

Environmental innovations and profitability: How does it pay to be green? An empirical analysis on the German innovation survey

Ghisetti, Claudia
Primo
;
2014

Abstract

Much of the empirical literature analysing the relation between environmental innovation and competitiveness has focused on the question whether "it pays to be green". We differentiate between different types of environmental innovations, which will be disentangled in those aiming at reducing the negative externalities and those allowing for efficiency increases and cost savings. What we analyse is at first the extent to which these two typologies have impacts on firms' profitability with opposite signs, and, secondly, whether the motivations driving the adoption of those innovations make the difference in terms of economic gains. We find empirical evidence that both the typology of Environmental Innovation and the driver of their adoption affect the sign of the relationship between competitiveness and environmental performance. Innovations leading to a reduction in the use of energy or materials per unit of output positively affect firms' competitiveness. Contrarily, externality reducing innovations hamper firms' competitiveness. The empirical strategy is based on a sample of German firms and makes use of a merge of two waves of the Mannheim Innovation Panel in 2011 and 2009 that allow overcoming some endogeneity issues which may arise in a cross-section setting. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2014
AREA13 - SCIENZE ECONOMICHE E STATISTICHE
Articolo su rivista presente in almeno un database (EconLit, MatScinet, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, Publish or perish)
Inglese
Articolo in rivista
Inglese
Energy and material efficiency innovations; Externality reducing innovations; Mannheim innovation panel; Profitability; Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment; 2300; Strategy and Management1409 Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management; Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Settore SECS-P/06 - ECONOMIA APPLICATA
Elsevier Ltd
75
75
2014
106
117
12
Articolo su rivista scientifica / specializzata
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Ghisetti, C., Rennings, K., Environmental innovations and profitability: How does it pay to be green? An empirical analysis on the German innovation survey, <<JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION>>, 2014; 75 (75): 106-117. [doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.097] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/131690]
none
262
Ghisetti, Claudia; Rennings, Klaus
2
art_per_29
03. Contributo in rivista::Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/131690
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 405
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 370
social impact