The first part of this article is devoted to the comparison between interregnum and dictatorship comitiorum habendorum causa, whose different requirements are highlighted for their establishment. In light of this comparison, the paper aims to demonstrate that the dictatorship of Q. Fabius Maximus in 217 b.C. was established by means of an interregnum, as stated in the Fasti Capitolini, and not through a popular vote, as claimed by Livy and other sources.
Mazzotta, M. C., Interregnum e dittatura comitiorum habendorum causa: il caso di Q. Fabio Massimo nel 217 a. C., <<AEVUM>>, 2016; (1): 125-140 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/130680]
Interregnum e dittatura comitiorum habendorum causa: il caso di Q. Fabio Massimo nel 217 a. C.
Mazzotta, Maria Chiara
2016
Abstract
The first part of this article is devoted to the comparison between interregnum and dictatorship comitiorum habendorum causa, whose different requirements are highlighted for their establishment. In light of this comparison, the paper aims to demonstrate that the dictatorship of Q. Fabius Maximus in 217 b.C. was established by means of an interregnum, as stated in the Fasti Capitolini, and not through a popular vote, as claimed by Livy and other sources.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.